{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/2/2017 2:57:19 AM
35
A REAL SCIENTIST WHO SAYS MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS A SCAM
-
A REAL SCIENTIST CONFIRMS I HAVE THE BIGGEST DICK IN THE WORLD
-
Climate Change is the result of Supreme Leader Kim Jong il wanting it be a thing.
-
We shouldn't use argument from authority to believe something is true.
-
4 RepliesJust because a scientist who has a PHD ecology (which has nothing to do with the study of climate change btw) says that climate change is a myth doesn't mean jack shit. [spoiler]Nit only that but Crowder is an asshole, almost as reliable as Infowars[/spoiler]
-
3 RepliesWow a Phd in Ecology really makes him an expert in climate science.
-
1 ReplyPretty ironic that you won't respond to Cellar Door after he proved you wrong.
-
1 ReplyWhy not just be proactive and work towards clean energy so that way the scientists you don't believe will shut up, and it never becomes a devastating problem in the first place?
-
3 Replies1 scientist vs Thousands of Scientists
-
9 Replies>I found a source on the internet >it must be true
-
Here's your "scientist." [quote]Moore's views and change of stance (see above) have evoked controversy in environmentalist arenas. He is accused of having "abruptly turned his back on the environmental movement" and "being a mouthpiece for some of the very interests Greenpeace was founded to counter". His critics point out Moore's business relations with "polluters and clear-cutters" through his consultancy. Moore has earned his living since the early 1990s primarily by consulting for, and publicly speaking for a wide variety of corporations and lobby groups such as the Nuclear Energy Institute. Monte Hummel, MScF, President, World Wildlife Fund Canada has claimed that Moore's book, Pacific Spirit, is a collection of "pseudoscience and dubious assumptions." The writer and environmental activist George Monbiot has written critically of Moore's work with the Indonesian logging firm Asia Pulp & Paper (APP). Moore was hired as a consultant to write an environmental 'inspection report' on APP operations. According to Monbiot, Moore's company is not a monitoring firm and the consultants used were experts in public relations, not tropical ecology or Indonesian law. Monbiot has said that sections of the report were directly copied from an APP PR brochure. The Nuclear Information and Resource Service, an anti-nuclear group, criticized Moore saying that his comment in 1976 that "it should be remembered that there are employed in the nuclear industry some very high-powered public relations organizations. One can no more trust them to tell the truth about nuclear power than about which brand of toothpaste will result in this apparently insoluble problem" was seen as forecasting his own future. A Columbia Journalism Review editorial criticizes the press for uncritically printing "pro-nuclear songs" such as Moore's, citing his role as a paid spokesperson of the nuclear industry.[/quote]
-
4 RepliesHow do I already know it's dumb@$$ Crowder?
-
Doesn't matter, the human race will kill itself somehow.
-
You must be so proud of yourself jimmy
-
11 RepliesCool, you found one of the 3% of stupid scientists! There are so few, must have been hard!
-
39 RepliesThat "scientist" (if you can call him one anymore) is literally just a paid shill for the logging industry and chemical insecticide industry.
-
7 RepliesGhost, you just said DDT isn't harmful to the environment or people, so I think you just need to stop.
-
26 Replies>scientist wat
-
Literally Poe's Law incarnate.
-
7 RepliesGotta point out that Moore hasn't been an acting scientist for nearly 30 years and is a lobbyist for corporations opposing anthropogenic climate change. He isn't a real scientist, and is in fact paid by energy corporations to speak against scientific consensus.
-
6 RepliesThe part about the environmental impacts of oils sands he cited are false I have seen the data from the scientists working there (buddies of mine). There are huge environmental issues with the river ecology around the tar sands, so alarming that the Canadian government who funded their research will not let them publish the data and they also no longer allowed to work on the actual grounds. Another issue when he said a slight warming would equal more vegetation because its wetter, this cannot occur under current conditions because human made landscape alterations (changing forests to ranch land, clear cutting for lumber). He also acknowledges that there is a strong correlation between CO2 levels and temperature (scientists have already noted as he says that they sometime are not in sink because it is not an instantaneous thing. The temperature always lags behind the carbon levels). These correlation are in direct relation to the amount of fossil fuels we are burning. He is also claiming that a global raise in temperature is a good thing, however, I would strongly disagree with that based on the fact that we are already seeing mass coral bleaching as a result of warming oceans. Its also a stupid argument because as he says there are only a few arctic species evolved to living in the cold so if its warming more could this would also mean others will go extinct ie. polar bears. He claims to be a scientist but doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate. Also claims to not understand complex physics when just stating that the science is wrong. He is also anthropocentric, only cares about the impact on humans not animals which as an ecologists is odd. All in all it's a good spin-zone but I think I will stick to what actual scientists have to say who understand the physics of climate change, and don't view the issue in a vacuum. Many have already discredited him because of his financial influences but his scientific claims are wrong, but keep sipping the far right tea child.
-
[quote]https://youtu.be/ZDK1aCqqZkQ[/quote]
-
1 ReplyEdited by Flee: 5/2/2017 6:22:24 PMYou know that this is the guy of the infamous pesticide video, right? The one in which he tells people it's perfectly safe to ingest harmful pesticides sprayed on crops and then backs out when handed a glass of the stuff? The fact people like Crowder host him is both laughable and pathetic. He hasn't been a scientist for ages and is notorious for exploiting his past by lobbying for polluting corporations. Educate yourselves: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/greenpeace-statement-on-patric/ https://skepticalscience.com/moore-2012.html https://www.desmogblog.com/patrick-moore http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Patrick_Moore http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/about/history/Patrick-Moore-background-information/
-
[i]*sighs*[/i] Read up on climate change and form your own opinion.
-
1 ReplyNOT CLIKCBAYT
-
11 Replies>ecologist >crowder LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THE SAME GUY WHO MISUNDERSTOOD A PAPER UNDENIABLY SUPPORTING ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE AS NASA SAYING THAT FOSSIL FUELS COOL THE PLANET LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Ah, ghost, you're too funny man. Too funny.
-
3 Repliesif climate change is ACTUALLY ENDORSED AND PROMOTED AND EXPLAINED BY POLITICIANS then thats all the proof u need for its ulterior motive aka masked oppression. these marauders live by only 3 rules: (1) oppress/control the masses, (2) make more money than they're currently making, and secure lifelong investments, and (3) avoid public scrutiny and sentencing.
