all fools with these dick cheese in this thread need to learn the facts.
girls like a circumcised penis wayyyy more. Period
English
-
[quote]girls like a circumcised penis wayyyy more. Period[/quote] Uh, no. I'd know.
-
[quote][quote]girls like a circumcised penis wayyyy more. Period[/quote] Uh, no. I'd know.[/quote] It's a common misconception. The ones who claim to like it more usually never tried an uncircumcized one
-
Edited by Ahsinjii: 4/23/2017 5:36:55 AMWrong thats only American women the rest of the world overwhelmingly prefers normal. And smegma build up is only an issue for those who don't bathe
-
that's wrong lol
-
In what way?
-
basically all girls prefer cut and the second thing is like saying having a cough isn't bad unless you don't have cough drops. its bad to even have it in the first place
-
Edited by Ahsinjii: 4/23/2017 6:31:16 AMFrom a post I made earlier Only American women prefer circumcised the rest of the world overwhelmingly prefers uncut. And additionally there [i]is[/i] a great deal of evidence to suggest that circumcision reduces sexual sensitivity, as research has shown that all of the most sensitive parts of male genitalia are removed during circumcision. NSFW https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif http://www.nacs.eu/data/press_release001.pdf Circumcision is denounced by American and Canadian medical institutions http://web.archive.org/web/20120215182208/http://www.cpsbc.ca/files/u6/Circumcision-Infant-Male.pdf "The benefits of infant male circumcision that have been promoted over time include the prevention of urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases, and the reduction in risk of penile and cervical cancer. Current consensus of medical opinion, including that of the American and Canadian Paediatric Societies and the American Urology Society is that there is insufficient evidence that these benefits outweigh the potential risks. That is, routine infant male circumcision circumcision in a healthy infant is not recommended" And even more so by European medical institutions http://www.nacs.eu/data/press_release001.pdf And as long as one bathes with regularity and is not a disgusting pig smegma build up need be of no concern. Additionally female genitalia produces 7 times as much smegma as male genitalia. You are either a troll or extremely closed minded and incapable of critical thought.
-
all wrong
-
I can't comprehend what goes on in the head of people like you. Even when faced with insurmountable evidence, you just go "no that's wrong." Seriously, is this a mental health issue?
-
insurmountable evidence? literally everything posted is an archived document, not a single web article or any source that is managed and reviewed. press releases? lol [quote]And additionally there is a great deal of evidence to suggest that circumcision reduces sexual sensitivity, as research has shown that all of the most sensitive parts of male genitalia are removed during circumcision.[/quote] this is also a completely bullshit claim and lmfao has no source. I'm not going into detail because this is a cringy topic in general and it really doesn't matter, except to people that are uncircumcised. wonder why? and I ca tell you if you get triggered over me saying "all wrong" you cant be a conservative because that is there exact strategy. begone
-
Yup. It's a modern grooming standard now because of them. Not that I'm complaining.
-
I thought girls didn't like their period
-
[quote]I thought girls didn't like their period[/quote]