{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/8/2017 5:26:14 PM
9
Mass effect Andromeda, who is more advanced?
I was playing Andromeda and the races have me a little confused. Who is more advanced, the Remnant/ Jardaan or the Reapers/ Protheans? In game they say Prothean Tech on mars is more advanced than remnant tech, but the Remnant technology looks way more advanced (they have Terraforming capabilities with vaults that run underneath entire planets, they even built a Dyson sphere). The biggest thing the reapers ever built was the citadel, the remnant/Jardaan built an entire planet. But Remnant tech is less advanced than prothean tech?
English
#Gaming
-
3 RepliesEdited by Smash House Breck: 4/8/2017 6:03:12 PMThe Reapers were the most advanced, as they build the mass relays and all of the technology that is used by the races in the Milky Way, or at least allowed versions of their technology to remain such as with the Protheans. They said that while Prothean technology was more advanced, it was also more user friendly than the Remnant tech. In regards to terraforming, you have to remember that the reapers took care to leave planets habitable for future species, and leave enough technology behind for them to get sufficiently advanced before the next harvest, so maybe terraforming wasn't something the Reapers and therefor Protheans focused on. That doesn't mean that they didn't have the capability to do so, and it doesn't mean that they were less advanced than the Remnant, even with regards to terraforming. [spoiler]They did manage to build a collector base practically in a black hole, so...[/spoiler]
