{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/22/2017 4:24:04 PM
13
It's better, but it's nowhere near as good as it was in year 1. It even looked better back then.
English
-
The option to switch between firing modes makes it better than year 1...IMO of course
-
Regardless, that shit is ugly as -blam!-
-
I prefer the new look.
-
The damage that it can do right now is the exact same damage it was doing in Year 1. The only reason it doesn't seem as good right now is that the Suros Regime actually has competition in the form of Hand Cannons.
-
The headshot multiplier for Suros in year 1 was 1.5. It was nerfed repeatedly until it reached a 1.25 multiplier and the recent buff brought it up to 1.3 NOT 1.5. So, no, suros is not the same as it was in year 1.
-
Yeah you are right. I was looking at the wrong line on a spread sheet so apologies. 😬 Suros Regime used to kill in 5 headshots (back in Year 1 before nerf to Auto Rifles) Now you need at least 6.
-
I saw 4 headshots from old gameplay
-
Most people didn't run armor back then because it mean nothing, so that 45 or so headshot damage with no falloff damage was quite epic.
-
Ok. Thank you for replying and being courteous you are one of the few members who truly help in keeping this forum from becoming truly toxic. Thank you.
-
At least in my opinion.
-
Thanks, but this forum is already toxic so... 🙃
-
i kinda like the red and black look better.but i agree. The Suros was better in year 1 i just think it does amazing damage ever since the patch.
-
Still bad
