{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by kn1ne:
2/21/2017 7:34:59 AM
9
The Red Death nerf was accidental and they're rolling it back but I like to think the Thorn in year one, last word in year two thing was intentional to reflect the lore.
Edit: corrected mistake in replies for all those who keep replying without reading.
English
-
Not fully, which is absolute bullshit
-
Edited by Nimue: 2/21/2017 4:04:46 AMRed death stays nerfed. Not getting fixed but suros is getting fixed. Nvm you already know
-
Bungie doesn't do anything intentionally. Bungie: we nerfed something for no reason and it ruined multiple weapons? Oh, we meant to do that. And your house is on fire. Your welcome!
-
Sorry bro, but Bungie said in another post about upcoming health regen perks that red death is to stay as is.
-
Sorry you're right it was Suros getting reversed and they're buffing the health you get back from Red Death by 58%. My bad.
-
No worries. I'm just curious as to why they change one and not the other.
-
Because Red Death is guaranteed and Suros is only a chance.
-
Yeah me too. I'm guessing it's a technical reason that they haven't been able to find a way to do it without rolling back the whole change to hungering blade.
-
Nah, they could do it if they want, they just have their own reasons.
