{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Revenant:
2/8/2017 4:17:20 AM
8
Explain to me why we should continue to import the third world, and not look after our own citizens first?
-
Because these ideas of an in-group and an out-group are the result of a history we never chose, and continue simply because we perpetuate the belief. They don't change the value of one human life in relation to any other.
-
1 ReplyDems and Libs silent.
-
Because guess what third-world immigrants tend to vote for? That's right - a larger government.
-
Edited by Catty_Wampus22: 2/6/2017 5:50:51 AMWhen's the last time a Republican administration cared about the vets? Look at the last Bush administration as a horrible example. Republicans only see vets as photo ops and campaign rhetoric, they don't give a -blam!- about them in real life.
-
1 ReplyGee, wonder why VA arent helping? 🤔 http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/01/24/trumps-federal-hiring-freeze-could-hurt-vets-officials.html
-
You're assuming it's impossible to do both.
-
Because I support the free market. A private company can hire who they want. Forcing companies to do something is a liberal stance.
-
Third world is cheaper. For the same work, it is obvious to conpanies to choose the cheaper option to maximise profits. Does it help you? No. Does it hurt you? No. It's just good business. Importing is also a private sector thing whereas the citizens part is a government duty. Its not like you cant manage both, because they are not related. Failure of government to look after vets =\= failure of private sector to provide expensive jobs.
