{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/31/2017 3:37:59 AM
7
An emotional appeal designed to make the reader disregard thought beyond their initial emotional reaction to what they're being presented and instead concern themselves with how they feel and how others might judge them, neither of which are arguments of course.
English
-
Okay, then what's your argument [u]for[/u] the ban? Because if you think it will stop terrorism you are 100% wrong. If a terrorist wants to terrorize there are many methods besides buying a plane ticket and flying here to do it. Ever heard of internet radicalization and home grown terrorism? Banning flights from majority Muslim countries does nothing but keep fleeing refugees from coming here. Fighting terrorism is like gun control. No matter what you do, it will always be there. Trump's order does nothing but throw fuel to the fire of radical Islam. He's a fool.
-
[quote]Okay, then what's your argument for the ban? [/quote]No nation is obligated to let people from any other nation within their borders. There ya go. That's literally all the justification needed. You can go further into reasons not to, but that's just icing on the cake. [quote]Because if you think it will stop terrorism you are 100% wrong. [/quote]It's not designed to stop terrorism. That's a strawman. [quote]Fighting terrorism is like gun control. No matter what you do, it will always be there.[/quote]Hence gun control regulations like criminals not being allowed to purchase guns. Andunlike gun control, foreigners do not have a constitutional right to enter America, so regulating travel and immigration is much more straightforward than regulating guns. [quote]Trump's order does nothing but throw fuel to the fire of radical Islam. [/quote]What's your argument here? That taking steps to impede radical Islam fuels radical Islam so we shouldn't take steps to impede radical Islam? Because if that's your argument I'll be happy to demolish it but I'm just trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that you wouldn't try to argue something so stupid. [quote]He's a fool.[/quote]Not an argument.
-
He literally made the ban to help stop terrorism.
-
Edited by OLDSCRATCH4: 2/2/2017 8:18:58 PMPerhaps you should read it before parroting what the screamers scream. It cover a lot more than just terrorism. It covers things that happen here with regularity. [quote]The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law. [b]In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred (including "honor" killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own) or those who would oppress Americans of any race, gender, or sexual orientation.[/b][/quote] Copied directly from the executive order. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/27/executive-order-protecting-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states
-
Edited by LxGhostSniperxL: 1/31/2017 4:51:30 PMExcept that it won't. You think a terrorist can't get on a flight in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, or Pakistan? You know, the places where terrorists come from that aren't banned? Also, ever heard of home grown terrorism and Internet radicalization? Banning flights from 7 countries isn't gonna solve or fight that.
-
Oh i am well aware of that. I was just addressing the hole in dahuterschruters explanation
-
[quote]help stop[/quote]
