{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/21/2016 5:40:56 AM
6
What's wrong with the back in the saddle quests for the Titan?
Do you think the immobious should allow the player to choose the of light perk that makes it expend no ammo or do not do that? Also do you think that the Fabian strategy should get a buff so than legendary auto rifles can't out perform it? Let me know your thoughts.
-
Both Titan exclusive weapons should be able to fire out from inside a WoD. They both don't have much range anyways.
-
12 RepliesIf they added HCR to Fabian as a perk, I believe it would be much better
-
3 RepliesMy thoughts: [u]Fabian[/u]: I haven't seen the Y3 buffed version yet. I was so disgusted by that 15% damage drop in the Y2 version, I made shards of it and have not been motivated to restore it. Besides, my Titan uses his exotic slot for heavies. Had I been deciding how to buff it, I would have been very simple: reduce the 15% damage drop to 7%. They went with something much more complicated. [u]Immobius[/u]: I really want to like this gun, I really do. But sadly, I have no use for Armor of Light. I want my Titan to leave his bubble and get back in the battle, albeit with some protection, so I'm an exclusive Blessing user. So I'd have liked it if it had been something like "kills with Armor of Light or Blessing of Light use no ammo" or something like that.
-
1 ReplyFabian is already better than Legendary Auto Rifles bar Genesis Chain.
-
I've always believed the discrimination of WoL or BoL with Immobius never made logical sense.
-
Fabian performs just as goo as doctrine imo imobious perk is crap barely procs for me anyway. Now being able to use it with no ammo while in AOL would be better assuming it gets the buff it so needs to range
