{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/24/2016 11:53:16 AM
75
How can trials be skill based when the only skill required is a higher light level, im 387 titan and i play with nearly maxed armour, but i still get 2 shot by a guys mida when hes just a 395 hunter, how is that a fair thing? Thats not skill, thats the abillity to damage someone more than they can you, and the matchmaking is so poorly done, ill have a team of a 378 387 and 390, and it will put us against a team of 395+ everytime, how are we ment to go flawless there? Im not an 'average player' i know how to play pvp competitively, but that is not trials, and until its made light level advantage disabled then it will never be skill based.
English
-
That's not possible lol. You must have either been team shot or have taken damage prior.
-
[quote]That's not possible lol. You must have either been team shot or have taken damage prior.[/quote] This guy knows the truth
-
Liar. Quit making excuses and just admit they were better than you like how everyone I played yesterday was better than me.
-
Big accusation there, youve never seen me play, you dont know if anyone was better than anyone, stay of a forum if your just going to throw accusations around.
-
It's not an accusation based on nothing. Mida simply will not 2 shot in that situation as you've already been told countless times.
-
[quote]It's not an accusation based on nothing. Mida simply will not 2 shot in that situation as you've already been told countless times.[/quote]
-
You mentioned nothing about midas, you straight up called me a liar, and had nothing to back it up but saying they were better than me, so yea it is an accusation based on nothing.
-
The mida was the pretty obvious part of the lie. You said it 2 shotted you when it clearly didn't. That means that was a lie.
-
No it wasnt an 'obvious part of the lie', you said i lied and didnt specify anything, you made an accusation out of nothing.
-
Considering that 95% of the responses to your post have been calling you out telling you that mida doesn't 2 shot, it was very obvious. If it wasn't obvious to you, you have more problems than just being a liar.
-
I never lied, i have had experiences where i have been 2 shot by midas multiple times and have dozens of videos to prove it, it may not have happened to you but thats not my problem, instead of making accusations based on nothing, how about getting problems like the one im posting about noticed so it can be fixed, instead of being a salty person who has nothing better to do than to accuse people of things on the internet.
-
You don't understand how light advantages work. MIDA does 57 for headshots in non leve advantage playlists. That means it takes 4 shots for a kill even against the lowest armor guardians. A difference between a 387 and 395 is so negligible that it would only make the headshot damage of MIDA go up to 58. You would still need to get shot 4 times to get killed from full health.
-
Wheres your damage curve to prove that?
-
Edited by MonthlyMidget: 10/24/2016 1:20:47 PMhttps://www.bungie.net/en/News/Article/13754/7_Power-Still-Matters The damage curve hasn't changed since TTK so that article is still relevant. For someone to be able to 2 shot you with MIDA, they would have to be 15 level deltas away. That means a 400 light person would have to be facing off against a 250 light person, which isn't even possible in Trials since a 250 light person can't even access the activity.
-
How do you know it hasnt changed? Until you can prove that ROI has the same damage curve as TTK, you havent given me any evidence.
-
What evidence have you given besides your false anecdotes evidence?
-
I gave my experiences, i have clips in my large archive of xbox dvrs, if your going to try and have a go at me and tell me im wrong, get your evidence to prove me wrong, instead of complaining that im not sending you video links.
-
http://www.inquisitr.com/3562752/destiny-iron-banner-evolved-what-you-need-to-know-for-first-rise-of-iron-event/ Here's more evidence. From the article: [quote]Does Gear And Level Still Matter? Yes. A difference in 10 levels of light represents approximately a 2 percent difference in damage. Another way of looking at it is if you are at a 350 Light level facing off against someone at a 370 Light level, you will be at a 4 percent damage disadvantage.[/quote] Now will you provide your non-existent counter evidence?
-
So youve given me a link to an unofficial external website that has no refrence to any comfirmed relevance to anything destiny/bungie released, they talk about how it has changed in ROI, but provide the same graph of TTK as you did before, try again.
-
Let me teach you a lesson in logic. When you make a claim that is contrary to every single other person in the world, and defies all logic, then the burden of evidence is on YOU, not us. Show us a single clip of MIDA 2-shotting you from full health, or even an article or statement from Bungie stating that the power curve was changed since TTK to reflect what you claim.
-
[quote]Let me teach you a lesson in logic. When you make a claim that is contrary to every single other person in the world, and defies all logic[/quote] sorry spock, i only see you trying to deny my logic, not the entire world, ive had enough of your salty ass, if you dont like what i posted up dont reply to it.
-
You are wrong.....deal with it and give it up. You look foolish. Unless you have "this video proof" your argument is done. It's simple post a video with a two shot Mida kill from full health and you win. Otherwise you don't........
-
You have no logic to defy. You claim your anecdotal evidence as being more legitimate than the dozens of people that claim otherwise, yet provide nothing to support your point because you know deep down that you are incorrect and don't want to admit it.
-
I thought i didnt give any evidence? Make up your mind, no one has given any evidence to disprove anything i have said.
-
You gave anecdotal evidence, which is the scientific equivalent of no evidence. Do you know how logic works? Everyone knows 2+2=4, but if you come in here and say "hey guys, 2+2 actually equals 3!" then it's not our job to prove you wrong. You made a claim contrary to what's widely accepted as true, so the burden is on YOU to provide concrete evidence supporting your point.
