{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/17/2016 2:36:59 AM
4
So what is your point exactly?
A blade dancer wrecked you now you are mad about it?
English
-
What... the... You obviously did not read anything. Well I hope you didn't because then you'd have the worst reading comprehension I'd have ever seen. Hunters like to justify other subclass nerfs by saying "Well Bladedancers got nerfed I. Y1 (year 1)!" I'm saying that's a bold faced lie. Pretty sure that was covered in the first few sentences
-
So your one of those stereotypical fellas huh?
-
When *people* justify class nerfs with "But BladeDancers were nerfed in Y1! There. Less inflammatory. Regardless of how we feel about it, people say that nonsense all the time for whatever reason. I'm a man of the truth so seeing false information circulate like wild fire bothers me. They had minimal nerfs in Y1. That's the crux of what I'm saying. Nerfing in general is (mostly) stupid so why justify it with false information?
-
Edited by SavageSpy10: 7/17/2016 2:57:30 PMBladedancer shot nerfed in the June update they are closer to garbage than overpowered Edit: Ahh sry you are talking specifically year 1
