{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/18/2016 5:30:38 PM
3
So removing VF to a subclass that relied on a neutral game was fair?
Eople complained about bolts not VF. That class is now forced to play one game style in pvp and to make it worse they admitted no data supported it being OP.
So why the -blam!- am I forced to switch my solar grenades out just because you want your new DLC to be full of titans.
All I can figure is Rise of Iron is a titan DLC and they want to showcase that class. They need to make a reward system to reward people for switching. Not force everyone to do it like a Hitler run [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] camp.
English
-
I think people were complaining about burning for years and not the bolts themselves.
-
I don't remember seeing any of those. They hated that bolts was too easy as a delivery system for the burn. The most I ever remember about burn was when cornered people would ask to speed up ticks. Aside from that all else was bolts being too easy to use.
-
I don't remember seeing any of those. They hated that bolts was too easy as a delivery system for the burn. The most I ever remember about burn was when cornered people would ask to speed up ticks. Aside from that all else was bolts being too easy to use.
