The first time they made iron banner clash, almost everyone preferred control. But they just keep making it clash. Why?
Edit: God dammit every time I make one of these spur-of-the moment micro-rant posts they always blow up. Oh well. I don't care enough to do something about it. It's not like I'm gonna be playing IB anyway.
Edit: good god why is this getting so many replies
English
#Destiny
-
Clash is better than control for IB. When winning actually matters, like in IB, clash is better suited since alot of the community doesn't know how to capture zones, or even which zones to control, or the fact that you should just hold 2 zones rather than trying to take all 3. If people played control correctly I would be down, but alas they don't, so clash is better suited in my opinion.
-
Bungie said they wanted it to be different each time rather than it be control all the time
-
Most people don't know how to play Control or simply care more about k/d than objectives, and everyone else complains that people don't capture the zones and get mad about it. So yeah, Clash is better for everyone if you ask me.
-
From the comments I'm reading almost everyone does not prefer control. Silly rabbit. Like I told you earlier, don't come on here acting as though you speak for the entire community.
-
Clash would be best as many, MANY guardians do not seem to understand the concept of teamwork which is required in Control. At least in Clash we can all fend for ourselves, which seems to be what most want 😕
-
I like the shorter matches and most players seem to play control like its clash anyway.
-
Because it's not as sweaty
-
-
It's better as clash since nobody knows how to capture and keep zones in control.
-
People whine either way. It doesn't matter. People complain about noobs spawn flipping in control. Then people complain about campers and hard scopers in clash. Don't even get me started on rift.
-
At least in clash people play the objective.
-
Actually, all of the polls I've seen show that most people disagree with you. Myself included.
-
Isn't it clear at this point that nobody cares about Iron Banner or Destiny until the next update? What is it you're after?
-
Bullshit. Consistently people complain about IB Control more than anyone has ever complained about IB Clash for the past nearly 3 years. I think you're speaking mostly for yourself here. Also this is only like the 2nd or 3rd time EVER that they've made it Clash and was only introduced to IB as a new variant since TTK.
-
3 RepliesBecause I like it. Matches are half as long, which means I rank up twice as fast. Also I don't have to worry about some dipshit flipping spawns.
-
It could be IB Salvage and blueberries would still play it like it was Clash.
-
Don't know why people complain about Clash for the Iron Banner. When it's Control people play like it is a game of Clash by not capturing points and doing their own thing.
-
I do. Way better than rift or control...
-
1 ReplyMost players play clash anyway regardless of what the objective is
-
No. I love it.
-
People don't want clash? But people don't play the objectives.. So confusing
-
Speak for yourself mate, I'm gonna play the shit out of iron banner next week because I enjoy clash and think control is ass. Each to their own, it was your turn last time.
-
I rather play Clash than play Rift.
-
Makes no difference to me. I'll hit rank 5 on all three no matter what mode it is.
-
Can we just get iron banner rumble screw teams
-
Clash just goes back to the roots of PvP. There's nothing wrong with it and they rotate the game style anyway. There's nothing wrong with some team killing. The real question is why everyone gets salty when they know next month it will be something different? If you really dislike whatever this month's play style is then wait and compete next month.