{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/8/2016 11:09:06 AM
25
Dark Souls Lore Makes No Sense
If the dragons could breath fire, why didn't they just keep a dragon to light the fire?
English
#Gaming
-
I 100% agree, why focus on linking the fire when you can just rub two sticks together?
-
1 ReplyAww can someone not read? Are you spoiled to being spoon feed?
-
1 ReplyEdited by Onetimevirus8: 6/10/2016 1:27:53 AM1.The dragons were immortal in their age. 2.The Lord's used powerful souls to wreck the dragons. 3.the Lord's partied till there souls started to weaken. 4.the main Lord sacrificed his soul to the fire to keep there age of parties going. 5.everyone got all -blam!-ed up and started going hollow 6.that's basically where you come in and try to figure things out
-
4 RepliesYou probably think the eagles could have just flown the ring right into mount doom, don't you?
-
2 RepliesBro, you see, them dragons don't know how to do anything. Look at Seath. Seath is smart. Be like Seath.
-
Because when Gwyn sacrificed himself he linked the first flame to humanity. Thus the curse was made allowing only humanity to fuel the fire once more. The real question is why didn't they come up with a more fficent system to get hollows to the first flame.
-
1 ReplyI'm going to go out on a whim and say that the magic fire wasn't a normal fire.
-
6 RepliesA few reasons. Reason 1: By the time the First Flame started fading most of the Dragons were dead, genocided by Gwyn. Gwyn was the one who wanted the First Flame linked. Why in the world would dragons help him? Reason 2: The First Flame isn't a normal fire. The First Flame created the 4 Lord Souls; Light (Gwyn, Seath, & 4 Kings), Life (Bed of Chaos), Death (Nito), and Dark (Pygmy, Manus, Humanity). Presumably it also contained countless lesser souls. With these souls withdrawn, the First Flame didn't have the kindling to stay alive, as that was supposedly what the souls originally did. The only way to keep it alive was to offer powerful souls to it. However, the only way to return to how it was would be to offer [i]every[/i] single soul in existence.
-
*slow clap*
-
Or even better hire someone to gather wood every now and then to keep the fire going. Or better yet, invent matches, they can make firebombs yet matches are nonexistent, and in a world where pyromancers exist for crying out loud.
-
Don't be salty because you are too much of a scrub to 1v1 the lore, Git Gud
-
Your face makes no sense
-
...you're serious?
-
1 ReplyThe amount of people taking this seriously lol
-
It's not the fire part more of the fuel
-
By that logic, all it would take to light the flame is a matchstick
-
2 Replies[b][i]TRIGGERED[/i][/b]
-
*triggered*
-
The dragons couldn't do that. They probably wouldn't want to anyway, since the fire ended their age of ancients
-
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!.......oh wait you're serious?
-
Lmfao you're funny
-
Edited by Kone19ps: 6/8/2016 1:25:59 PMNot every dragon had flames and it's a different kind of fire. The first flame is more like the soul of the world. Not just a fire while dragon flame is just a transient flame. It feeds on souls and dragons lack them
-
The same reason as why pyromancers can't do it. To link the fire simply means being powerful enough to become the fuel of the flame in order to extend its life cycle, you cannot add fire to fire.
-
1 ReplyBecause almost all the dragons were killed by Lord Gwyn and his knights and Seath in the first game and all the dragons in the third game aren't real dragons. They're all either drakes or wyverns, false imitations of dragons.
-
Would you help someone who killed your entire race even if the first bonfire worked that way
