{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/20/2016 8:55:55 PM
139
Why shoulder charge should not use a melee charge.
Shoulder charge is the iceing on the cake for the striker. And nerfing that would ruin the whole subclass. The striker is mainly used for close combat and nerfing that would be like nerfing Viking funeral.
And i wonder why is shoulder charge such a big problem? Its not OP or whatever just a ability.
-
11 RepliesIt's an ability that can ohk and be used repeatedly with nex to no cool down, that's why it should at least take a melee charge. No other class has an ability like that excluding backstab and that requires a melee charge.
