Here's the situation that people don't seem to understand. Without this bill, if a male student walks into a females locker room, he gets kicked out of the locker room and reprimanded. Now with this bill, if a male student who "identifies" as a woman walks into a females locker room, the the school would have absolutely no right to kick them out or reprimand them for this. There will be instances where the person is in fact, transgendered, but in the instances where they factually are not, there is nothing the school can do to stop that individual. I realize it's important to regard all persons rights, but where are the rights of the individuals who do not feel comfortable around those of the opposite biological sex in vulnerable places such as locker rooms and restrooms? Are we only catering to very small minorities with disregards to the majority? [spoiler]I'd like to add that I know personal responsibility plays a factor in this (like using set bathrooms isn't stopping molesters from doing what they do), but this bill doesn't make it more difficult for sexual assault to occur, it makes it easier. I'd rather have a pedophile 1000 ft away from my child versus 800ft, even if they both result in the safety of my child.[/spoiler]