{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/11/2016 7:37:49 PM
9
Call Of Duty: Infinite Warfare
Yet another Call of Duty enters the fray! I honestly don't know why these assholes don't listen to their fan base. Seriously? Another futuristic FPS? Well in my opinion I have no grudge against the campaign since it's only a small trailer and hasn't come out yet. Except for black ops 3's campaign which was absolutely HORRIBLE story telling at its finest!! Anyway I don't see the problem with jet pack boosters or thrusters or whatever the hell haters call them but the only thing I REALLY have a problem with is the COPY AND PASTE sorry excuse of a multiplayer we always -blam!-ing get!! I don't have a problem with black ops 3's because I love the black market and specialists along with zombies and the new gunsmith customization mode they added. What is boring is the combat system that includes players wanting to be their own Rambos!! Basically chickens running around the -blam!-ing map with their heads cut off with no source of team tactics, communication, and co-operation!! Where the -blam!- are vehicles at!!? Did none of these companies learn anything from World At War or Modern Warfare's multiplayer mechanics!!?
English
#Gaming
-
1 ReplyI think the reason people don't like the boosters it because of the *ahem* "[b]MLG TRICKSHOOTERS WHO ARE SO COOL JUMPING OFF BUILDINGS AND HAVE A NARROW CHANCE OF HITTING SOMEONE. THERE SO COOL[/b]*ahem*. I think that's why. There mad that it's to easy or something. A lot of cod players are actually trickshooters. I think they thought that people would like the boosters because of that. I actually quite like them. That being cool stuff was me being sarcastic. I personally think they look stupid. Just my opinion.
-
-
10 RepliesI'm sorry, but this whole post is -blam!-ing stupid. Do you know how long the game has been in development for? Three years. What was out three years ago? Ghosts. They were listening to their fan base. The saw people didn't like it so they tried something new. If you think they can just trash two years of development because of the setting then I guess you can go throw a way 2/3rds of your money. Also, the Bo3 campaign was the most creative and different campaigns in cod history. That is, only if you can figure it out for yourself. *inhales*
-
11 RepliesIt has been in development longer then the fans have hated futuristic so they can't change it. If you ask me, it is broken development plan.
-
2 RepliesI just don't understand why Activision feels the need to use [i]3[/i] different developers, Treyarch, Infinity Ward, and Sledgehammer. If they used one developer maybe they would listen to their fans better...
-
10 RepliesHonestly though, black ops 3 has the 3rd best story of CoD, behind Bo1 and MW2... It literally f[u]u[/u]cked your mind
-
21 RepliesI don't think you realize but infinite warfare has been in the makes for the past 3 years. This game has been in the makes before a futuristic call of duty came out.
-
3 RepliesThat's what CoD does. Recycles the previous game, update graphics a little bit, changes a few things, than releases one every year with the price tag of $60. And people still buy them.
-
4 RepliesWhat point are u tryin to make mister?
