[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] zzthejimzz Wow, you guys are passionate. Why is it that everything is analyzed and picked to death? Just curious.[/quote]Why not? If an individual thinks something is wrong, or could be improved, there's nothing worse than taking no action towards that end. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] American Recoil So, "We do not want you talking about modifying or tampering with console game hardware or software. Period." is the idea and it is pretty clear.[/quote]If you'd bothered to read the thread, you'd see this is actually what we're arguing to have put in place. You'd have seen that, in actual fact, someone who assumes this is what the rule means is in error. They've applied a common misconception and as a result, come up with a misconceived conclusion. This rule is somewhat ironic in that having a greater understanding of it than the average person will leave you more likely to breach it. As much as I want the rules to be clear, and as much as I've argued for them to be so, they shouldn't rely on such ambiguity (especially when it's erroneous) to attain that clarity. If you've just read a rule and thought to yourself "Oh, so it said x and i think that it must mean y," as you have just done then chances are the rule should've read 'y' in the first place. [Edited on 01.25.2011 1:08 PM PST]