The answer is no. I have absolutely no desire to have sex with other men. So, yes, heterosexuals do exist.
Edit: you also set up this poll on a forum full of underage kids who have never had sex....
English
-
[quote]I have absolutely no desire to have sex with other men. Edit: you also set up this pole...[/quote] [i]pole[/i] Freud would have a field day with this.
-
XD lmao
-
Nice catch
-
Cheers.
-
I don't think true heterosexuals exist. Liking men in any way, whether it's platonic or not means you're not totally straight. Being 100% heterosexual would mean you have absolutely no desire for men. No matter if its just a bromance or a hug. You'd find any of that repulsive, which I believe is impossible for the most part.
-
Umm... Having platonic relationships has nothing to do with being Heterosexual or Homosexual, it's the romantic relationships that decide this.
-
If that's your logic then homosexuals don't exist either. And humans are all guilty of pedophilia and animal cruelty for feeling any kind of love for children or animals.
-
Not true, homosexuality is different. There is a gay gene which makes people gay. There is no straight gene or bi gene as far as I know. Plus pedophilia is having sex with children. You're not a pedo unless you do that. Same with bestiality.
-
Lol normal genes are straight genes. Those are the genes that cause you to develop in a way that makes you desire the opposite sex
-
Normal genes? There are no "normal" genes when talking about sexuality.
-
Yes when you think about it. Most people have genres that makes them attracted to the opposite sex.
-
Of course but they also have a very slight attraction to the same sex.
-
Edited by Dolphinizer: 1/28/2016 11:46:00 PM[quote]Of course but they also have a very slight attraction to the same sex.[/quote] [b]Dude you're Bi just fuçking accept it.[/b]
-
No they don't. I've never felt attracted to a male. I've never loved or had a crush on a male I hate penis and seamen. And with this logic, you're also implying there are no true gays.
-
No one on either side is truly, exclusively attracted to their preferred sex.
-
How would you know?
-
Then I'm not bi sexual unless I have a desire to have sex with people of the same sex, which I do not. There, heterosexuality does exist.
-
It doesn't. I've explained why.
-
It does, and I've explained why. If you truly follow the logic you presented then there are no sexualities. Also the "gene" you mentioned is actually a "defect" or "mutation". As in unnatural.
-
It's not a defect or mutation, it's just a regular gene. 1500 animal species practice homosexuality, only 1 disproves of it. That alone shows you're wrong.
-
I am a lion and I disprove of it.
-
Edited by RynoTheEdgeLord: 1/25/2016 7:16:51 PMThat number you presented includes bacteria (which I think I'm gonna not take sexual advice from) also, most cases of animal "homosexuality" don't necessarily include sex. In which case I wouldn't consider it homosexuality. Just because there's two male dogs who have a bond and play together, doesn't make them homosexual. If they're humping each other (for pleasure and not dominance) then I would accept it as homosexuality.
-
[quote]hat number you presented includes bacteria (which I think I'm gonna not take sexual advice from) also, most cases of animal "homosexuality" don't necessarily include sex. In which case I wouldn't consider it homosexuality. [/quote]They do. Look it up.
-
I did. The article described "homosexuality" as "not necessarily sex".