{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/25/2015 7:59:40 PM
3
Tell me. Would you eat from a bag of M&Ms if you knew that 1/10 were poisonous? Same thing here. We can let people in, but there is no guarantee that none of them are really terrorists. There can always be some that take advantage of the refugee input to spread violence.
English
-
Statistics show that more then 75% of the refugees are women and children under the age of 15. Radical jihadists age group is men thru the ages of 17 to 30. So we should refuse innocent women and under age children? Refusing them makes them more prone to ISIS conversion. They see that the world doesn't want to help but here comes this man that preaches riches, wealth and all the food and protection in the world as long as you fight their cause. What life would you choose? Live in fear and camps with hundreds of people or accept a terrorist way of life and have food, land and money?
-
75%. Not 100%. Have you ever heard that a small part of a group can ruin stuff for the whole group? Great example. Besides. There's enough shit going on already.
-
So why can't we allow women and young children in? And refuse elder men? Or just leave these children in that harsh reality and let ISIS keep recruiting them.
