{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/22/2015 5:58:56 AM
421
Should Raids Have Matchmaking?
Should they? I personally think it should be optional.
English
#Destiny
-
Optionally, yes. It could be useful because what if someone is too lazy to gather up randoms at the tower but instead just select the raid and join in. Although I will admit most random I play with on raid are either CoD rage fan boys or immature little shits so...this really isn't meant for me.
-
Cause there are complete idiots that will just cause wipe after wipe, some trolls, and some please who just don't want to put in work to get the rewards etc
-
17 RepliesNo because all these new randoms are just really really bad, and if you don't agree please respond with a video showing you running a few noobs through the old raids, its ridiculous
-
1 ReplyAFK AFK Retard Elitist and/or knowitall Won't shut up You. NAH.
-
just sayin afk dudes annoying as fuu -.-
-
3 Replies- 6/6 players found - "Does anyone know how to use sword?" - *crickets*
-
Ppl wont stop using lfg if they introduce matchmaking.
-
Yes, it will make it easier to get into a VoG but this thing takes a lot of team work so the time you save finding a team you usually would spend working through the lack of communication.
-
Optional yes, personally I wouldn't use it unless it was like Crota where it's easy, but for VoG and hopefully Kings Fall it will require great communication
-
I never have a problem with matchmaking being optional. It's how it should be honestly.
-
3 RepliesYes because it literally doesn't change the way you can look for teams now.
-
9 RepliesEdited by R merc G: 8/31/2015 10:56:39 PMThe current matchmaking system is designed to [i]quickly[/i] pair players for [i]easy[/i] content, not [i]intelligently[/i] pair players for [i]challenging[/i] content. It simply doesn't have the features to enable players to succeed. For example: say I'm in a weekly heroic and someone leaves. No biggie, just finish it with two players. In a raid? You need to wait.. and wait.. and hope that one of the other four team members doesn't lose their patience and leave too. Add in the potential for checkpoint-hopping: someone getting paired with your team at Gatekeeper but they wanted Templar, so they bail. Additionally, the lack of an "expected wait time" feature when queueing for an activity means that players have no idea if it will take 1 or 15 minutes to find a team. Again, not a big deal for strikes, but with the community spread out among several more activities, who knows what is popular and what isn't?
-
-
Solo it's easier
-
2 RepliesNo, because u could get paired up with first timers or noobs and fail plus don't u want to start at a certain checkpoint?
-
lfg is matchmaking
-
I think it should for normal modes only. Hard modes requires a little more skill and communication.
-
Maybe a waiting list if you want to take a certain player after checking their stats on the forums. Bad stats is a no go. Good stats are flying good.
-
1 ReplyNot until vote to kick is a thing
-
Optional. Shouldn't force you, but there are a lot of people out there who don't have friends because they are wierd
-
optional do I am not forced to play with afkers
-
-
[b] [/b]
-
Yes, because I want to find a cure for the AFK cancer not just treatment.
-
How many times do people ask this question?
-
1 ReplyVote to kick Elitist Dumb people No mic Dumb people Noobs with no mic
