This again? Really? How many people are going to complain about the same thing while also showing they have no understanding of capitalism....company investments....or how competition works in the market place. First off......just because you are a gamer you are not entitled to play something just because you want it. You must purchase the correct items to be able to play some games or have some content. Secondly MS started this specific type of competition in COD/Skyrim....and other games. Why don't you go to MS and ask them why they started the gaming industry down this specific road for company competition? Thirdly Sony paid money to Bungie as part of the contract Sony was the only company allowed to advertise Destiny for their system......AND they also got special kick backs from bungie for their gamers as an incentive for those gamers to play Destiny on the PS4 rather than on the Xbone. In reality its the Sony gamers who should be complaining that MS gamers even get access to the content after a year......Sony was very generous to allow that in the contract. Finally....this is all about free market competition. Companies are allowed to compete in ways that attempt to make their product the more desirable one for a certain market. In this case Sony chose Destiny and MS chose Titanfall........Sony ended up making the right choice while Titanfall became Titanfail because most people stopped playing after a short time because the PVP aspect of the game was seriously gimped. Also Bungie did not insult half of their playerbase....incase you have not been paying any attention there are about 2 PS4s for every 1 Xbone. At best your argument would be that they insulted 33% of their playerbase. Your argument is bad and is based on pure emotion and what you "feel entitled to" as a gamer. Well as a gamer I can "feel entitled" to play Halo but if I don't purchase a MS product then I wont be allowed the opportunity to play this game even if I feel entitled as a gamer to play said game. It is fair and proper business practices for a company to try to provide an incentive to purchase their product over their competitors.... if you call a carpet cleaner to come clean your carpet and they offer to also clean the windows and the exterior of your home as an incentive to use them then a customer who chooses to use a competitor CANNOT complain that it is not fair you got this deal from this company because they did not get this same deal from the company they chose. It would also be ridiculous for that customer to then state it is unethical and bad business practice for one company to offer a better deal than the other and in fact both carpet cleaners should be forced to offer the exact same services at the exact same prices. Instead what you should be is a smart consumer. You need to look for and recognize deals when you see them and if you choose to forego said deal then that is a decision that you as a consumer have chosen. TLDR: Learn to be a smarter consumer or face the consequences of always getting less for your money.