JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#Halo

8/3/2010 4:33:36 AM
393

New Halo the Fall of Reach has Canon problems

In the new version there it states that reach comes under attack at 2542 and not 2552. the battles for Sigama Octanus and Reach are now 2542 Cole is now a Fleet Admiral in 2530 Admiral Stanforth is now a Vice Admiral 700+ ships attacked reach [Edited on 08.03.2010 1:53 PM PDT]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Wow, great, here I was thinking that the new editions were not just going to be more halo milking but actually contribute something to the halo lore. Looks like I'm sadly mistaken. So, it seems that a lot of people have an issue with the dates and the number of ships, but did the book actually change anything meaningful? Like the MC not seeing elites until 2552? And the other bajillion other minor mistakes that I notice every time I re-read the novels but always seem to forget what they where later on? Also, I'd just like to say that Halo Legends was terrible. And the Package is just flat out the worst thing to happen to Halo canon. Anyone else thinks that most of Halo: Legends should be retconed? Oh man I can't wait to see how else Halo canon will be -blam!- up in the next few years.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

1 2
You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon