JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#Halo

8/3/2010 4:33:36 AM
393

New Halo the Fall of Reach has Canon problems

In the new version there it states that reach comes under attack at 2542 and not 2552. the battles for Sigama Octanus and Reach are now 2542 Cole is now a Fleet Admiral in 2530 Admiral Stanforth is now a Vice Admiral 700+ ships attacked reach [Edited on 08.03.2010 1:53 PM PDT]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] StealthSlasher2 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Plasma3150 The books beforehand were also filled with discreptancies. Besides, Nylund should have known better than to make these mistakes. Afterall, he did have access to the Halo Bible.[/quote] Keep in mind that Nylund wrote Fall of Reach back before Halo 2 was conceived. He's not at fault for anything in regards to the reissue seeing as how 343 decided to reissue the original version.[/quote]Nylund also wrote the original FoR in the 3 weeks prior to Halo 1 launching, and from the sounds of it, he had less errors in that then this one. Now I seriously question whether to get the Forerunner Trilogy or not. Before I was going to read that and be done with Halo fiction, but it looks like I might be done after Reach. Damn, how I miss the good old days back in '01-'07 when Halo's universe wasn't completely -blam!- up. I seriously don't understand how someone could miss these huge typos/approve the rectons. Hell, a cursory skim through the book would've solved half this crap.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

1 2
You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon