{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/4/2015 2:12:07 PM
15
No. Putting optional in front of it doesn't make it a valid argument either. You would have a shit load more twats in matchmaking than you would find in lfg.
English
-
Edited by mgzilla: 6/5/2015 10:20:45 PMOMM: oh hey there's some twats in my game, I'll go find another game, exit, find game, matched, ok these guys aren't twats lets go ^^2 minutes LFG: oh hey I friended these guys from LFG but they're twats, let me delete them and find some more people, delete, delete, go on LFG, spend way more time than the above finding another group Edit: and actually getting into both twat then non twat games with OMM would almost certainly take longer than finding one group on LFG [spoiler]rekt[/spoiler] [spoiler]TWAT[/spoiler]
-
Your reasoning is flawed
-
Nah [spoiler]see what I did there?[/spoiler]
-
Agreed. These people calling people twats are basically just describing themselves and why they have no friends. They need only look into the mirror for the reason why they can't find anyone to do events with.
-
You are honestly the biggest piece of shit on this forum right now. Go the fvck home
-
-
So, essentially...a majority would migrated out of LFG to the random portion of the "optional" mm. Win for for you...Yes?
-
A win for me would be all matchmaking removed from PvE
-
Removing all matchmaking...so then all of the "bad kids" are funneled into LFG... Increasing the probability of picking one of them up... Interesting "philosophy"...
-
I have groups already for PoE and raids. Strikes would be better solo than with randoms
-
If you already have groups... Then what is the point of advocating the removal of mm from the game?
-
The completion rate for end game would be just as low as it is now. Matchmaking wouldn't fix anything
-
That is purely speculative. Given that there of 1000's (being conservative here...it is much more) of players that never played end game content...the probability of even one(1) group of strictly randoms failing to successfully complete...is not feasible. Now throw in some sherpas that will play among the groups...and completion rates increase. Statistically speaking...your assertion is flawed...
-
Not really
-
Time will tell..
