{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/15/2015 11:46:47 PM
3
Doesn't prove anything. The top hunter players could just be better than the top warlock & titan players. Or hunters could be OP. Or the top 100 hunter players, while still having played a lot, could have played way less than the top warlocks/titans, leading to skewed data.
English
-
There would have to be a reason why top players choose hunters that doesn't have to do with the hunter skills, otherwise you prove yourself wrong. Since that's unlikely (HIGHLY), it is thus because hunters are OP.
-
Edited by Slayer_NK: 5/16/2015 12:32:22 AMHunter is the most similar to traditional FPS classes, plus going into the game everyone knew both hunters were offensive. Just my 2 cents
-
Good point, but that would have to apply to all of the top players used in the KDR calculation. Another factor to consider is that the top ranked players all play extensively. It would be highly unlikely that those who started off with titan just can't get as good as someone who started as hunter, because of some bizarre link between personal preference for hunter and some inborn ability to be better. It is more likely that given enough time investment, people could get just as good as others who play a lot, IF the classes were equal. Because the KDRs are so vastly different, however, this discrepancy must be because titan players (for instance) have run into the fundamental limits of their class. Another point to consider is that we're talking about 3+ KDRs here. So even the Titans must be [b]very good[/b] with traditional fps skills. They can't get 3.9 KDR only because the titan class is fundamentally inferior to hunter in PvP.
