shouldnt they have weapons to defend themselves against nations that want to wipe them out?
English
#Offtopic
-
Edited by dendrox: 4/30/2015 10:10:22 PMWell at least America and Russia aren't acting like children with them anymore by threatening to blow each other up with them over political disagreements. Oh wait I'm mistaken, they still have missiles pointed at each other... Just get rid of the bloody things and let's not act like children by spying, fighting over which system is "best", etc and just agree to disagree. Only reason these weapons should even be touched is if it is a life or death situation and the only reason war should happen is for keeping the terrorists away and defence, not for taking over other countries/spreading your ideology, disagreements on something, or to get some extra $$$ since none of those things are worth the lives of people.
-
because they will use them
-
Probably the same reason you don't give a gun to a 10 year old
-
Personally I believe that no one should have nukes just because stupid shit like the cold war happens. But Iran is highly unstable and tends to have a high percent of terrorists and that's just not gonna work.
-
The only person who should have nuclear weapons is John Cleese
-
Uncle Sam said no /thread
-
2 RepliesBecause their country is unstable
-
Because most of the people in that region are a bunch of asshole fanatics who wouldn't think twice about using those weapons.
-
Bc they wouldn't be responsible. We own nukes bc we are reponsible. And bc we are 'MERICA
-
2 RepliesNo, they already stated that they will use them on Israel the second they get one. That's why
-
7 RepliesI don't think anyone should have nuclear weaponry.
-
Nukes should never be used, by any country. It kills thousand of people at once.
-
1 Reply"ISIS"
-
5 RepliesBetter question, why [u]should[/u] they?
-
The only reason that anyone would want to destroy Iran is because they have promised war to most western nations. They also said that as soon as they get a nook they will nuke Isreal
-
Because they're not america
-
Edited by OPs Mother: 4/30/2015 2:44:32 AMBecause nuclear weapons in an unstable area is a bad idea especially when that area wants western civilization gone
-
Because nuclear wrappings cause too much destruction. No one should have then m
-
Edited by moshdubs: 4/29/2015 12:22:58 AMBecause Iran has had a bad track record with the international community they are known fund terrorism, neglect its own people, secretly operate a nuclear facility without consent, and have made a vow to wipe the Jewish People of the face of the earth... No country that shows these traits should ever posses a wmd... I mean... Look at North Korea...at least China and Russia are telling them to chill tf out when they go nuclear boner crazy But no one will be there to say that to iran who will be at the doorstep of one of the last stable countries in the Middle East... Israel, not to mention are strong allies with the western world...
-
Edited by Masque of Night: 4/28/2015 7:09:13 PMI think a better question is, why should [i]any[/i] country have nuclear weapons? It's understandable for a nation to have a standing army and military budget to defend itself, that's the reality that we live in, but not a single person on this planet should be trusted with an arsenal that's literally capable of decimating all life on earth if used efficiently. Regardless of how trustworthy a person may be, there's always that, "What if?" And that's a pretty risky "What if?" if I had to say so myself. This especially applies to countries with unstable governments or those that are surrounded by an unstable environment, that just exacerbates the risk.
-
3 RepliesIran shouldn't have WMDs because they won't hesitate to use them on America, Israel, and every other free country.
-
8 RepliesA nuclear holocaust doesn't worry you?
-
"Hey, that guy over there has a big stick! I need a bigger stick!"
-
It hurts just to see the title. But the description was the finisher
-
because allahu akbar.
-
Nobody should have nuclear weapons. Iran specifically shouldn't just because it's not a stable place. Why should a place that could change from democratic ally to fundamentalist totalitarian enemy in two days have nuclear weapons?