{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Ze TacoLover:
4/24/2015 3:08:21 AM
22
AT-ATs on rails...your point?
Somehow many of you think this alone..this one friggin vehicle that I guarantee a majority of you just used as a spawn point, is apparently a good enough reason to just hate on the game. There's more than 2 heroes btw so don't let dip sheyt wolf and his chart mislead you all. We barely have any info and you all are barraging them for more when they're not allowed to release every bit of the game.
[spoiler]It was a cinematic trailer btw. Calm your shit people[/spoiler]
-
Edited by Velocity51: 4/27/2015 2:05:25 PMDon't mind, I was the one that mostly took down AT-ATs rather than the one driving them.
-
3 RepliesI can understand the AT-ATs on rails for a mode called walker assault. Obviously it plays an objective role in that mode. Now for any other mode like conquest or TDM then they should be able to go anywhere. One thing I'm still not sure about is if the Y-wings and other bombers will be flyable. You can see them twice in the trailer ( second time showing Boba fett in the top left corner) and they are grouped up. So that almost seems like it could be a killstreak reward. If you do fly them and they are all grouped up then it's probably limited movement and only for a set amount of time. I hope I'm wrong though.
-
1 ReplyWhy are we fighting about this? We should be going apeshit over it only being 20v20! Why does bf4 get it but not this?
-
4 RepliesWow thanks, I stole that link from a friend anyways. No need to hate.
-
1 ReplyI actually used them in Battlefront 2 to destroy the shield generators, and as a spawn point. I think there would be better team co-operability if the AT-ATs are controllable.
-
11 RepliesEdited by ReignofSpartain: 4/24/2015 8:56:17 PMIt's ppl like you that let them get away with what they have been doing to gaming. [spoiler]you are the cancer of gaming[/spoiler] [spoiler]bet you still defend destiny and next dlc [/spoiler]
-
2 RepliesIt's Star Wars. They have my money already.
-
I think its understandable they are slow as all hell and if they are intelligent rails instead of a player driving the wrong way five people shooting with it going towards the battle at all times is a good thing
-
A man with sense! Kill him!
-
I havent seen any gameplay. So idk yet. But it will be probably be decent.
-
3 RepliesPeople have to find things to complain about... Guaranteed 90% of these battlefront complainers are going to buy the game anyway. Lol
-
49 RepliesThey've pretty much cut vehicles entirely.
-
17 RepliesNo campaign. No galactic conquest. [b]Loadouts[/b]. No thanks.
-
I always used the at at in fine with no space battles or campaign but the at at I'm not gonna not buy the game but I'm sad
-
Edited by Eirikur: 4/24/2015 4:37:35 PMMy point? I want to be able to drive one of the most iconic vehicles, that's my point. Their poor excuse for not making it drivable is horrible. Also, I dislike the game for a lot of different reasons, AT-AT's is not the biggest one.
-
11 RepliesIt is the having no space battles that puts me off of the game. Was looking for a star wars game, not a star wars skin on a battlefield game.
-
Edited by Kuronak: 4/24/2015 7:56:58 AMI'll wait for E3 for my main judgement but as it stands I'd rather have a 10 year anniversary remaster of Battlefront 2. No Galactic Conquest, Campaign, or space battles? I'm sure the content that's going to be in the game will be decent but with all those features cut and a max of 20v20, it's barebones so far. If that's how the final game turns out, I most definitely will not waste money on it.
-
9 RepliesBecause restricting gamers is always a good. I don't blame Dice for thinking the majority of the SW fans are retards that don't know anything outside them movies, but they shouldn't restrict gameplay either.
-
7 RepliesEdited by A Jackal Sniper: 4/24/2015 3:39:53 AMAnother thing DICE is doing to restrict players. I'd like to drive the walker if I want to thank you very much, and not have it as a glorified moving turret. And no one cares about the damn cinematic trailer, everyone's pissed at how DICE is doing an awful job of keeping what made battlefront great in the upcoming game.
-
4 RepliesThere doing what Battlefield does best, taking away vehicles that the previous games had. I would've loved if BF3/4 had controllable aircraft carries, destroyers, submarines, AC130s, just transport planes in general, LIKE the older games had, but don't have now... why? IDK... it just sucks I bet they'll do a "Battlefield" on us with the snow speeders, they won't be 2 man like they were
-
1 ReplyWell you don't know how I played the game so don't try to speak for me. You obviously never used the at at because it may have been slow but it was Hella fun blowing people away
-
1 ReplyEdited by Kafuu Chino: 4/24/2015 3:19:40 AM[quote] I guarantee a majority of you just used as a spawn point[/quote]Speak for yourself. >not strolling up to the map center and blasting any poor sap that doesn't find cover >implying removing player freedom is ever a good thing [quote]We barely have any info[/quote]They've given enough to tell us to not get our hopes up.
