JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

Edited by Bradw317: 2/25/2015 6:39:32 PM
58

PVE vs. PVP and the Activision problem

The debate rages on as the upcoming update is probably going to start on Feb. 24th from 10am to 12, strong hunch considering I got this little red strip telling both Destiny and Bungie.net is going taken offline on this day for maintenance. The update is going to nerf all weapons, we will no longer loose heavy ammo when we return to orbit, get matchmaking for weekly Heroic strikes, and a new little window to check our reputation across all our factions. We get no new badly needed expansion to our vaults, no matchmaking for PVP or Raids though many would argue this point. PVP is being shown way too much love and the reason is Activision and their Call of Doodie mindset they want Bungie to do what they have only been able to do in one way and that's mutliplayer make a shitty game that's actually good, unfortunately Bungie hasn't been given enough creative control, all the things that made Halo: Reach one of the best FPS around has been strangled by Activision for one sole reason, the almighty dollar, yin, euro, pound, etc. Here is what I think led to the recent shit that is going down. PVP - My Plug1.ONE fusion rifle can't go toe to toe with that guys Suros Regime. Activision - Don't worry next patch we'll fix it, he'll need to get in closer before the damage will do anything to you. PVE - Wait that means I'll have to get in closer to that lv. 33 Major Knight in the Crota's End to do any damage to him, with my Suros. Activision - Play Crucible it won't be be a problem there. PVE - I suck at Crucible don't nerf my Suros because that idiot is using the wrong weapon for the job. And what about my shotgun? Activision - We can buff your shotgun but we'll need to nerf the range. PVE - You mean get within striking distance of that Knights OP'd sword get cut in half and get my raiding team pissed at me, no thanks, how about this nerf only PVP and leave us PVE players the F--- alone we don't need nerfs we need buffs. Activision - Sorry it'll seem like favoritism. PVE - You mean like it already is I get it, so what about a new PVE Event. Actvision - Have to wait until House of Wolves, until then how about another Iron Banner it's next month. PVE - You suck. I rather have Queen's Wrath with level 32 gear and a cool exotic for all f--ing grinding I'll have to do for it. Activision - Sorry we can't exclude the PVP players. PVE - Then what the f--ing thing is Iron Banner for, you dip shit. Activision - Oh your interested in Iron Banner, please join the next one in March. PVE - UGH, your totally f---ing bias/ This is my take on what I've been seeing
English
#feedback

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by Matu Flp Krawfe: 2/26/2015 2:41:26 PM
    PVP has been Bungie's fixation since Halo 2 (and its what they most commented on in the reception of CE. Never mind the millions who bought the game for the most immediately playable aspect of it, some people held LAN parties!) What the hell does this have to do with Activision (who at worst published a series that merely followed along with[i] Bungie's template[/i] which Destiny merely [i]continues[/i]?)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon