[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] LaDavid [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] NewRadical12 Almost exclusively in the context of private religious organizations. This is not a private religious organization. Religious groups do not get to have their "morality" trample the rights of those who do not wish to partake in their sects.[/quote] Is that just because you don't like it, or is there some other reason?[/quote]You're going to have to be more specific. [quote]Also, what is the difference between somebody using religion as a basis for this and somebody using some other non-religious reason? Would it be acceptable to you if it wasn't for religious reasons, and if yes, why? Why is that basis shunned but other acceptable? (Assuming they both arrive to the same outcome in the end.)[/quote]I have already said that I object to the reasoning, not the ultimate outcome. I have already said, repeatedly, that there certainly are perfectly agreeable and legitimate reasons to restrict alcohol form time to time and place to place. My objection is that personal moral (or religious) edicts, beliefs, and dogmas be allowed to trample on the freedoms of those who do not share those beliefs. The religious are in no way being harmed by the presence of alcohol simply because it is against their religion to consume it. Wanting an absence of alcohol to make an area more peaceful and safe is acceptable because peace and safety are benefits that can be enjoyed by all students. The lack of some sort of religious or moral offense is not if one does not share those convictions.