{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/2/2014 11:05:06 AM
3
Strange, didn't seems to matter what weapon I used It was a killing machine.
But in all seriousness I felt the weapon balance to okay. AR were best at close quarters which were most PvP encounters occur. And since most idiots try and use PRs and SRs up close but get wrecked they claim OP. ARs are best at close range but can be used at med range.
PRs are best at med range but still okay at closer ranges. And SRs are best at longer ranges.
All there weapons have their niches use them outside of that niche and somebody with a weapon specializing in that range will wreck you.
The weapon balance was fine in beta
English
-
Hardly. Overall, weapons chosen in battle and results yielded in kills show that AR was just better than most guns in most scenarios, while other guns were nearly useless in all scenarios. They will likely continue to buff and nerf guns until data shows that all weapons have a more even spread of use.
-
Even use will nvr happen 95% of engagements are close range engagements And the best primary weapon for close quarters is an auto rifle. If you want to use an PR or SR stay off the objectives and kill ppl heading to them. Most ppl do not like support roles and thus try and rush in with a pr or SR and get wrecked then complain. Ppl need to learn to use weapons properly b4 complaining that something is OP.
-
I don't think anyone really complained about the auto rifle. People complained the other guns weren't that good in PvP and they were right. The PR and HC were both pretty bad in PvP and the scout rifle did just fine in anything but shot gun range. The AR was simply too good to bother using most other weapons in most scenarios and they don't want that, so they are changing it. I really never saw anyone complain about the AR.
