{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Gasoline Alley
2/8/2013 5:53:37 PM
10
Experimental "shorty" Mustang
[url=http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2013/02/08/experimental-shorty-mustang-to-appear-at-amelia-island/]Too bady this never made it to production.[/url]
What do you think of it? Would you drive a shortened two-seat Mustang?
-
Necrobump this atrocity
-
Ew no. Mustang is trying too hard to be a muscle car.
-
Imagine what that would have evolved into in today's market.
-
Do not like! With a shorter wheel base, that thing would have been a Weeble.
-
Only as a convertible.
-
Yes I would.
-
Throw some rear window louvers, a front air dam, and a tasteful spoiler on it and it would look ok. Lose that horrendous fuel cap.
-
1 ReplyThat's hot. Back seats in two-door sports cars are usually impractical anyway. Not enough room for an actual human to sit, bunch of added weight, and a hassle getting in and out. I do love the early Mustangs, I'd really like that one.
-
Is it bad that all I see when I look at that is a car? What do ordinary Mustangs look like?!
-
That fuel cap is atrocious. I take it this was meant to compete with the Corvette. Which as an aside, I'm thinking of buying one in the next two weeks.
