[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What Is This1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] annoyinginge [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What Is This1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MadMax888 Statutory -blam!- can be consensual, and doesn't even have to be actual intercourse. The mere fact that not all the participants were of legal age of consent is what makes it statutory -blam!-.[/quote] I know that just means there is a possibility that she consented. Though that doesn't mean that she was not raped. The main issue here is that the article is lacking the necessary details to really give an accurate say in the matter.[/quote] She consented. That's a fact. Read the article.[/quote] Hmm let me think about this. I quoted the article on the second page of this thread and even talked about how ambiguous it was. I even agreed that she could be lying and asked someone to see if they could link another article with more proof. Yeah how about you read the damn thread or even all of my posts before tying to say I didn't read the article. Simply put you don't know for a fact that she wasn't raped. It is possible that she agreed to have sex with him and went to her parents saying he raped her after she got pregnant. Though we don't know that from the article. So I will say to you what I said to someone else if you can find an article with the same girl showing that she wasn't actually raped then I will say that you are partially correct that she consented. Even though she is under the age of consent and can't legally consent.[/quote] It says from the attorney of the rapist that it was consensual, though wrong. If you need more, look, he got a possible 2-5 (or so) years but was ultimately sentenced with 16 months probation. That sentence is for statutory consensual, an actual aggressive -blam!- would warrant a much harsher sentence.