What is this? One can't let the quality of a game be determined by democracy, that's ridiculous; the system is flawed. There are simply too many reasons for why it doesn't work, such as being able to vote/vote against without having played it, not having reference of what a specific game meant for its time, yet being able to vote for a game that resonates with ones [i]time[/i]. And how does the fact that one can vote against something in order for its competition to fair better, make the it worse? Example: someone who likes Marathon will vote for it and vote against Doom (its competitor), completely disregarding that Doom acted as a foundation, and that Marathon owes much its innovation to it. And the Doom devotees will do the opposite. It is now about who has the most fans.
But it's just for [i]fun[/i] right, so no need to get worked up?
[Edited on 11.17.2012 9:29 AM PST]
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.