{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/8/2013 8:24:59 PM
7
-
[I]Clearly[/I] from a competitive standpoint. CE>CE PC>TU Reach>3>Halol 4>Halol 2 (come at me)>lolReach>Halol 2 Vista
-
Lmao placing halo 2 after halo 4. You must be autistic
-
What an excellent conclusion. I can clearly see what you based it off. No oxymoron there.
-
That would be dyslexia you're thinking of...
-
Erm... I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Regardless, your conclusion is flawed. Facts stated about video games aren't implications of autism. [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyYwLCDyCU]Please continue. Halo 2 is a piece of sh1t in terms of core gunplay. With Halo 4, you can at least take away most of the bullsh1t with custom game options.[/url]
-
Halo 2 has the highest rated MP (by pros) of any halo game. And it came out 11 years ago so no shit the gun play isn't going to be as good as halo 4's. GTFO
-
lol I'm not even going to argue this one. The "Pros" can suck it because a game that came out 3 years before it in the same goddamn series was objectively better as a competitive title. The only reason the game is fracking worshipped is because of its competitive saving grace BXRRRXYYRRXBBXB which wasn't even put in on purpose. Bullet Magnetism? Auto Aim? Hitboxes? Melee Lunge? Glitches? Halo 4's is pretty bad, yes. But not near Halo 2.
