{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/27/2011 1:05:58 AM
163
How can anyone think that this is fine?
[b]Number of people who didn't fully comprehend the OP: 18.[/b]
Armour lock is an [i]absolute counter[/i] to the sword.
Here's the scenario: I have a sword, and I lunge at you. You armour-lock, taking out my shields and stunning me, and then you pop out and pummel me.
I've done nothing wrong. I've simply used the sword the only way it can be used. Despite this, any competent armour-locker (Lol oxymoron) can kill me with ease.
There is [i]no way I can prevent this,[/i] save not using the sword at all.
How is that [i]fine?[/i] How is that [i]balanced?[/i]
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8x0-DFi5Jg]Proof.[/url]
[Edited on 04.15.2011 1:56 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] SonOfTheShire [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] pigsinspace38 don't stand there waiting for him like an idiot, find someone else to slaughter. /thread.[/quote] Perhaps you weren't paying attention. I lunge, he locks, I get EMP'd, I die. There's no waiting around involved. [/quote]the emp isnt in affect until 5 seconds unless your very very close to him.
