JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

Edited by Tonester: 4/20/2015 1:36:05 AM
96

Nerfs are necessary. Get over it.

Destiny is part shooter, part RPG / MMO. I can't believe how many people seem to play this game and have absolutely ZERO CLUE about how games like this work. The RPG / MMO aspects of this game are designed in such a way to keep people playing regularly over several months / years. There are some good topics on game design that you should google... but just trust me. This is true. When you design games like this, you MUST keep things challenging. You must also strive for this fine balance between a sense of accomplishment and a desire to achieve more. If they allow guns to only get better, never worse, then eventually the game will not be challenging. And once that happens, people will stop playing. Again, you probably don't understand this... and that is okay... because you aren't making games for a living so you don't need to get it. [u][b]Nerfs. PvE and PvP.[/b][/u] You need to understand how PvE and PvP are scaled compared to each other in order to understand how/why changes to PvP USUALLY make sense for PvE also. In the normalized Crucible World: - PvP guardians have somewhere around 200 health. - All the primary guns in this game are designed so that they can kill a guardian (PvP) in around 1 second. Some guns do it slightly faster, some do it slightly slower. This is just an oversimplified example. In the PvE World: We take those same TTKs (time to kills) and scale them based on the delta between Crucible and PvE Let's assume that the dmg of weapons, at level 32, is 10x as much as it is in Crucible Scaled PvE World based on PvP Stats: If a gun does 50 dmg per hit in Crucible, it will do 500 dmg per hit in PvE If a monster should die in around 1 sec from primary fire, it should have around 2000 health. With this baseline, the designer can then scale monster health and difficulty. Now, there are monsters that the designers don't want people to kill in 1 second. So they think to themselves... "How long should it take for a guardian to kill this monster?" If the answer is 5 seconds, then they will give that thing 10000 health. The bottom line? Some monsters are meant to be killed via teamwork, specials, and heavies, and supers. This is why weapon changes should typically be applied to both PvE and PvP. What does this all mean? If a weapon is nerfed in PvP because it is too effective (i.e. It kills guardians too quickly), this ALSO means this same weapon will kill monsters in PvE too quickly for the designers who have spent a ton of time creating strikes, missions, raids, etc with particular design goals in mind. [b]If a gun is OP in PvP, it is ALSO OP IN PvE. [/b] This is important to wrap your brains around. If you don't understand this.... you are beyond hope and you should just quit now because you'll have nothing but tears in the future because I 100% guarantee you there are more nerfs on the horizon (Hi, Gjallahorn). Now.... imagine that there are 1000000 glasses of water. Each glass represents a designer's intent. There are guns, supers, grenades, melee, perks, combos of perks, monsters, various levels of monsters, various frequency of monsters, respawn rates, combinations of monsters, etc.... each of these things is a glass of water. To remove water from something is to nerf it. To add water to something is to buff it. If the goal of the designer is to keep all of these glasses of weapon "relatively balanced" to each other (i.e. working as designed), what happens when 1 glass of water needs more water? Hey, the players looooove buffs, so lets just add water. No biggie. Everyone is happy. What happens if 1 of the glasses of water needs LESS water? Hmm... the players will get pissed if we nerf something, so lets just leave it alone. But now... all the other glasses of water aren't balanced relative to this one. That makes that 1 glass of water more desirable than all the others. Instead of removing water from that one, lets just add water to the other 999999. Yea - that won't be hard to do at all (/sarcasm). And even worse? What happens a year down the road when all Bungie has done is add water.... now all the glasses are full. Aka God Mode. Go look at every game with God Mode as an option... you don't play those for very long. Again, you'll just have to trust me on this one. [u][b]PvP Players[/b][/u] This is a feedback forum. PvP players have feedback on certain guns, tactics, supers, that are OP. Sometimes these are the result of people "whining" after getting their asses handed to them in Crucible. Sometimes it is honest feedback that has a ton of truth to it. Either way, sometimes... they are right. If there is a primary gun with a TTK below 0.8 seconds or so, it is OP most likely. There are a few guns that fit into that category. Conversely, there are some primaries with a TTK at 1.1 seconds and higher... they are probably underpowered. Now you can blame these PvP players all you want, but at the end of the day, the PvP players are not why your gun was nerfed. Your gun was nerfed because it was OP. Period. Bungie doesn't need these forums or these players to know that. They have stats. They play the game too. They already know. Go look at patch notes for: League of Legends World of Warcraft Guild Wars Essentially... go look at the patch notes for any RPG / MMO that has a healthy playerbase. They nerf shit occasionally. Why? Because they know what keeps people playing their games more than the people who are playing their games. Nerfs will happen. Nerfs SHOULD happen. Get over it. Stop crying. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black... [b]* EDIT - thanks to L3THAL LEMONS below *[/b] He brought up a good point. Certain guns are considered OP in Crucible but definitely aren't in PvE and vice versa. i.e. Icebreaker, Black Hammer, and Gjallahorn These are special and heavy weapons...and my post was mostly about primaries, but it still brings up a good point and he cites The Last Word in particular as a counter example. i.e. Some think it is OP in Crucible but I don't think anyone thinks it is OP in PvE. My post was mostly about damage and TTK as a balancing factor... not all of the "meta" that goes with a particular gun. Black Hammer is great in PvE because there are examples of targets that are easily predictable and/or don't move much. This isn't true in Crucible so it doesn't translate. And the Last Word is more of a close-range gun... and these are typically unfavorable in PvE due to Ultras and Majors.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You sir Need to die

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Op in crucible is not Op in pve. And u dont need nerfs for both thats just stupid.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Laws of all multiplayer shooters: 1. people will always cry a bout things being "over powered" 2. those who aren't crying, are probably winning. 3. the best place to locate a cryer is in that game's official forums. feedback

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    1 Reply
    • Someone drank the cool aid

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • So what you're saying is that they should just remove crucible, then PvE would actually be a lot better. I agree.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      1 Reply
      • Just because a gun in pvp is "op" does not mean it's op in pve. Also, there are suppose to be "op" guns in pve. That's how mmo rpg games are.

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        1 Reply
        • I'm ok with Nerfs as long as it's backed with good data. This hasn't been the case.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

          2 Replies
          • The Vex, Red Death, Plan C, No Land Beyond, and several other guns are insanely more powerful and efficient in PVP compared to PVE. If a gun is OP in PVP, that doesn't automatically mean it's OP in PVE.

            Posting in language:

             

            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            15 Replies
            • People familiar with MMO/RPG games understand nerfing? What??? When was the last time Bethesda nerfed a sword type in Skyrim? Maybe I haven't been paying attention, but I don't think I've ever seen a NERF in Dragon Age either. Effectively, what the AR NERF in Destiny was like is as follows: "Hey, have you noticed that no one is using a bow and arrow in Skyrim? I know! Let's make all the swords be made of wax so that everyone switches to bow and arrow!" Bungie effectively did that. One of their primary stated reasons for the NERF is that they wanted to drive people to use pulse rifles. In other words, the primary reason for the NERF was to force players to use a different weapon type. How does it make sense for them to dictate to me that I must alter my playing style to fit what they want??? Nerfing is NOT necessary. In an RPG (even a shooter), some weapons are better than others ... period. Each tier of weapon SHOULD be different in an RPG. Exotic > legendary > rare > etc. An exotic should be better. Otherwise, what on Earth is so exotic about it? Is it only exotic because it looks cooler??? If so, what the heck is the point? If my exotic is no better in actual gameplay function than a rare, why on Earth should I bother spending hours upon hours grinding for it? Nerfing has radically changed the PvE experience, and 80% of the Destiny player base is PvE. Take the auto rifle NERF again. Now, I only use Abyss Defiant. I only use that AR at Deathsinger in Crota's End because of the "confuse a witch" function. I used to swap weapons around and use multiple types. Now AR's are fairly useless except for a few key situations. PvP does need to be balanced, but the nerfing has radically changed PvE in negative ways. The solution should be to completely separate the PvP experience from PvE. In Halo: Reach, you could customize your spartan's gear. However, all that did was change your appearance. It gave you zero extra attack or defense points. That worked great for Halo PvP and overall Halo gameplay. Destiny PvP should be set up that way. However, it should be done in such a way that PvE is completely unaffected. The ONLY calls for nerfs come from the PvP player base (~20% of the total base). NO ONE who is PvE focused ever calls for nerfing ... NEVER! I for one hope Bungie figures out how to balance PvP without nerfing the heck out of PvE. It is very frustrating when a favorite weapon is suddenly rendered next to useless in PvE because of a NERF that was inspired by people b*tching about PvP.

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              14 Replies
              • Bungie doesn't understand the concept of balance so your argument is (slightly) invalid

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              • I've never seen more inept reading comprehension. I'm talking about the balance purely around scaled damage, TTK, and scaled health. Weapons like Black Hammer are better in PvE than it is in PvP but it isn't because of dmg or TTK.

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                2 Replies
                • Absolutely

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                • The TTK is what I get mad at that these people don't seem to get! The hand cannons not only kill too fast but have insane damage per shot. If you have a third health against a hawkmoon you're dead, you have a third health against an auto rifle and you can make it to a safe place to heal because that first bullet isn't going to kill you the fifth one would. This is a huge advantage considering that the hand cannons also have easy headshot hit boxes

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                • Edited by Randi Flagg: 4/20/2015 8:19:34 PM
                  Great posting. I go with you on most things... but the pve shotgun buff shows sometimed pve and pvp should be different things. Edit: could someon erase deathlikejon from this universe please? No mods here or anything?

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                  1 Reply
                  • interesting thoughts. I disagree "If a gun is OP in PvP, it is ALSO OP IN PvE." ^this premise is not true so that's where i stopped reading. (Assuming you built your argument on this flawed statement renders the rest of the words invalid.) I'll suggest the following If a gun is proven to be OP in the crucible based on statistics and heavy mathematics, then it MAY need to be assessed in PvE. Which will also be followed by statistics and mathematics, to determine exactly how it should be handled. Shotties were nerfed in PvP while at the same time Buffed in PvE. This was a good idea. I support approaches like this in the future.

                    Posting in language:

                     

                    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                    2 Replies
                    • Edited by RTWombat: 4/20/2015 9:02:28 PM
                      I agree with most of what you said, except for the fact that op in pvp= op in pve. Take the last word, for example. Incredible in pvp, but pretty meh in pve. Edit: just read your edit.

                      Posting in language:

                       

                      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                      1 Reply
                      • I disagree about nerf weapons for PVE. I spend time n many hours to grind...n do bounty n raid...and hoping RNG is kind to me to get the exotic guns. Once i get it...time spend again to maxed it out...n when i begin to enjoy the wespons...comes along a spidet called Bungie n hsppily NERF it...That is bullshit.

                        Posting in language:

                         

                        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                        2 Replies
                        • This all comes from someone with very little experience in the PVE part of this game. Learn both sides.

                          Posting in language:

                           

                          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                          2 Replies
                          • Raid matchmaking is necessary. Nerfs/buffs are not. Get over it.

                            Posting in language:

                             

                            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                            1 Reply
                            • This game is a joke. The most challenging part is predicting what glitch or patch of lag you're going to have to combat.

                              Posting in language:

                               

                              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                            • Yep, that's why I've been successfully called a nerfed on most weapon just for the heck of it. I spam nerfed on shotgun, fusion, hand cannon and auto rifles. And I'm spamming a nerf on pulse rifles, scout rifles and snipers right now. Wish me luck!!!

                              Posting in language:

                               

                              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                            • I apreciate the thought you put into this. I also disagree

                              Posting in language:

                               

                              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                            • Garbage LOL

                              Posting in language:

                               

                              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                            • Ruined your post oops N N N M M J J N L H H H H H N J J J G K B L L L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                              Posting in language:

                               

                              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                            • Oh and just fyi I will say this with a smartass tone.. The ghorn does not do anything special in pvp. There are way better rockets to use in pvp.. it is epic in pve. It is not a viable option for pvp. So in the case of your argument above if anything they would need a way to make it viable for pvp. So in that. It would need a pvp buff.

                              Posting in language:

                               

                              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                              3 Replies
                              • Boring you have too much time H H H K K O P U G F V U U H J H K L K H B H H H H H H H K L L L L L L M K J J K N N H K L J J H J K L K J B B V

                                Posting in language:

                                 

                                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                              You are not allowed to view this content.
                              ;
                              preload icon
                              preload icon
                              preload icon