Personally I'd chose ferrari for the racing pedigree. In adition lambo is owned by vw.
So... I see a lot of ppl would just buy a really expensive vw.
I would like to know why.
-
To me Ferraris just look better.
-
Edited by SixtyLion: 2/11/2015 6:09:59 AMFerrari because of their racing heritage and I am a die hard fan of their F1 team. In reality, it will be an extremely hard choice. Lamborghini actually owned by Audi, and it is not necessarily a bad thing. Quality of Lamborghini cars improved tremendously. Ferrari is currently owned by Fiat, and without these mergers Ferrari and Lamborghini would not survive. As car company Lamborghini actually started because founder of Ferrari, Enzo Ferrari, insulted Feruccio Lamborghini. At that moment Lamborghini was a relatively successful maker of tractors. He bought a Ferrari, and if I am not mistaken, clutch on his new car broke down. He called up Enzo, and in response to Lamborghini claim and criticism, Ferrari said something like "if you know so much about sports cars, how come you are building tractors". So Lamborghini decided to make fast cars. Look up Lamborghini Miura, it is wonderful car, considered by many as the first quintessential supercar. I was very fortunate one of my best friend's father owned a rental and a dealership of exotic cars, I worked for him for many years and had some hands on time with both Ferrari and Lamborghini. Older models from both makers notoriously hard to drive, they tend to overheat easily. I heard from several clients how they end up with overheated engine after standing in traffic. Newer models after merging with Audi and Fiat are more "civilized" you can drive relatively easy with the help from electronic driver aids. Bottom line, it is like picking blondes or brunettes. Both are magnificent cars with rich history. If you can afford one no matter which you choose you will be happy!!! If I could afford one of their cars I would pick a vintage Ferrari, 275 GTB or 250 GT Lusso. There is something about them that modern cars do not have.
-
Lamborghini's are too fat
-
I see so many lambos that it gets old...Ferraris are at least refreshing
-
Lambos are sexier. It's not like you'd go racing so speed/performance isn't an issue.
-
F[i]u[/i]cking white people....
-
Koinegsegg agera one. Nuff said.
-
Neither, id put that money to good use
-
Neither.
-
[i]Pikaaa pika chu pik pik pik chu pik chu[/i]
-
Lambo because they look cool
-
Lambo is indeed owned by vw, which means they're more reliable. Ferraris average several thousand dollars in repairs and maintenance per year owned
-
Ferraris hold their value better, but Lamborghinis look better.
-
McLaren
-
Bump so we can get more opinions
-
Ferrari has more class, Lamborghini tempts your inner child, whichever it's up to you
-
Outie (or however you spell it) is destroying what Lamborghini really is. I'm not into ferraries, either so both can go die in a fire. [spoiler]Yes, my dad is a mechanic. So, shots -blam!-ing fired. Bring it. [/spoiler]
-
Lambo McLaren Bugatti All you need
-
I choose Lamborghini because Ferraris are just ugly IMO... Lamborghini's look much nicer.
-
Lamborghini is owned by Audi just putting it out there
-
Mclaren
-
Lamborghini has lost its identity. Their newer cars scream sensibility and prestige when they're supposed to scream insanity and "Holy shit that car looks cool". That said, the choice comes between Ferrari and an auto maker that desperately wants to be Ferrari.
-
Edited by Trick-Star: 2/10/2015 5:49:53 PMFerrari is a poor man's luxury automobile. *sips tea/adjusts monocle/twists top hat/checks pocket watch/puffs cigar*
-
I would be equally happy in either.
-
I've asked about 30 random people what car they would choose if they could get any car for free. For some reason, most of them said they wanted a Jeep. And I live in the middle of a city.
-
Time breaker.