{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/18/2014 8:46:27 AM
10
Vanguard Marks... not worth it.
Is it just me or does it feel like Vanguard marks and Crucible marks are way different in relativity to being able to get gear and level up? I have been playing forever on my titan ( second character) which has been strict PvE, whereas my Hunter was strict PvP, both have been played a ton but my Titan is still lacking on gear, why you might ask? The answer is because the Strikes don't give enough marks for the time vested! It is almost not even worth it when you get to rank 2 and still don't have enough marks to buy one piece.
-
Edited by CanterlotMentor: 10/18/2014 9:44:38 AMi disagree on the enough strike marks part. What i do not understand is the 100 mark cap for a hole week. its basicly a slap and a middlefinger to the full time gamers. wich is not fair becouse they ( like me ) are still working their ass off to get the marks What i also dont understand is why crucible only gets you 3 marks for a win , and 2 for a loss. and a simple strike gives you 6. while both crucible and strikes have the exact same time played per match ( imo ) wich makes getting crucible marks is way harder than vanguard. In my opinion : - Delete the vanguard marks from public events, - Delete the 100 mark cap - Delete Vanguard marks from daily and increase the chance to get an legendary engram - Make both vanguard and crucible 2-3 marks per match - And maybe slightly higher prices for a item... Ps: before you work/married people begin crying it does not mean that when someone has 14 hours to game on a day , he has to do less to get the marks and get gear. and besides that i dont see why this is a problem that some people than might be higher gear in the longrun , becouse those people might help you getting gear too.. just saying. Cheers
