{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/25/2013 3:50:56 AM
13
What the -blam!-, I wonder how Obama will try to justify this.
English
-
I still don't see why every single bad thing happening in America is Obama's fault. It's too hot in California. Thanks, Obama, for making it too hot in this place.
-
Inaction is compliance. I hold him fully accountable.
-
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. In terms for politics, Obama can't get anything done because of the GOP basically saying "No" to everything he or his party suggests. The country is at a big gridlock until the next midterm elections. Hopefully, the people will be smart and vote in people who want progress rather than voting the incumbents back in.
-
Edited by Capitons Wang: 7/25/2013 11:19:12 AMIm not saying all, but during his administration, he could easily hold organizations and people responsible, or stop such things from happening, and its his fault because he doesnt. He is supposed to be representing us in washington, and he is failing.
-
Were he to do that, he'd be labeled as a tyrant or a dictator. Since he's not doing that and people are already accusing him of both, does he really need to do it to solidify what some people call him? The president doesn't have that much power. If we compared it to the other 3 branches, I'd say that the Legislative branch has much more power than the Executive. If only the Legislative branch (More specifically the House of Reps) wasn't run by a bunch of immature 10 year old kids in adult bodies, then we'd see some actual progress. Were Obama to represent what the Americans really are rather than what is best for the country, we'd probably end up taking it up the butt by Russia and China by now. The average American doesn't know jack shit about politics other than what they see on the television.
-
He can only do so much. The Republicans already failed at keeping a black man from the presidency, but they sure as hell won't let him accomplish anything if they can stop him.
-
He sure as hell could do a lot more.
-
Without any opposition and both parties working together? I'm sure he would've kept his campaign promises. But this is the real world, where old, backwards, racist white men own the world and have royally -blam!-ed us over.
-
Im not referring to campaign promises.
-
Whatever the reason, my statement still stands. He's being opposed on everything.
-
He is justifying the NSAs actions, saying they are necessary, he race baited the nation with his comments about trayvon, while ignoring the case regarding pharmaceutical companies no longer being liable for side effects that was decided at the same time. There is more, just like that. I understand the opposition he faces within the house ad senate, and know its a battle for him, but he could, since so many listen, be raising other issues, and stirring up a frenzy about them instead.
-
I agree, but he's the President of the US, not a preacher. He shouldn't be stirring up a frenzy about anything, just as he told everybody not to riot. I don't agree with everything he does, but we don't know the full story or what back room deals took place. All we know is what biased media tells us.
-
I try not to follow biased media, but a supreme court decision to strike down a woman's claim for suing a pharmaceutical company, for not disclosing a flesh eating side effect of their medication, and effectively rendering action against said companies for side effects, is pretty -blam!-ing atrocious, i understand he would have little to do with stopping it, but it was brushed under the rug. That whole 'my son' comment had no place in the debate, it did nothing but race bait. And now he is willingly ready to arm rebels, islamic extremists, in syria. So many disappointments.
