{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/1/2019 8:07:06 PM
4
Also, no. Bows should NOT be special ammo. That's so scuffed. They require genuine thought and skill. Why do you think most don't use em? It's not just because they have a huge optimal time to kill.
English
-
An exotic special bow that just does the same damage as arbalest would be cool
-
Agreed. Additions? Yes. Replacement? No. If they added special ammo bows that would be dope. 1 ammo on spawn, super low aim assist for balance against snipers. But all bows need to remain, as an archetype, as they are now. Just add more perks to the loot pool and more bows for every slot.
-
Edited by Dr. Kaal: 12/1/2019 8:21:24 PMIn the hands of a master even a straw can be a deadly weapon. But why would a master use a straw when there’s a loaded gun right next to it? Same with bows, they’re garbage to everyone except the best players who’d be better off playing with any other weapon.
-
You're dead wrong. I'm sorry dude, but my comp loadout is super reliant on my skill with a bow. I don't want that ruined because you think bows should run on special ammo. Some of the things in this game cater to niche playstyles. Meta is just what sweats use to feel good. The most efficient tool available is not always what is most effective for you as a player. Even if a weapon is superior to my bow, I would rather use that bow.
