{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Lewie730:
1/22/2018 1:54:21 AM
2
I think there is something to this. Even in Destiny 1. We would have a full fire team, we would win, win, win, and then eventually just get stomped. Then there would be a losing streak, and just as people were just starting to get pissed, we would match against a team and just destroy them.
That kept us playing, because people were starting to talk about playing a different game, then we would win and keep playing.
I absolutely believe they have some sort of metric that calculated a team's breaking point, and would give you an easier team to keep playing.
It wouldn't surprise me one bit.
English
-
It's fact, no postulating require.
-
Edited by EdwinS33Su: 1/22/2018 9:32:09 PMThe problem is that the wins and losses don't account for players going AFK for a few seconds or half the match, nor do they account for poor connection, poor team makeup (4 Titans), or a host of other contributing factors. This is far too small a sample size to reflect an algorithmic force. Not saying that it isn't true but there isn't enough here to prove that.
