{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/17/2017 8:39:01 PM
67
Why is it that Hunters are perceived as the crybabies?
Its not like the other two classes haven't cried nerf. How do you think they got so bad in the first place. Hunters have been nerfed more than the other two classes. And hunters dont complain about there own class sooooo. Yeah I wonder who cried nerf then?
-
5 RepliesEdited by TotalDramaGamer: 10/19/2017 3:30:49 AMIt's easy. Hunters were often classified (in D1 mostly) as the 'gun skill' class, thus, they were the 'most skilled' because they didn't rely on abilities. This was a hallmark of early Hunters everywhere, besides the fact that about half the Hunters were only Hunters because of the Cloak... but that's besides the point. Thus, when they want their abilities buffed or fixed, they're complainers as they should be the most skilled and not need the buffs, due to their own self renowned skill, of course. Hunters damned themselves.
