As much as I rag on destiny comparing the 2 isn't really accurate. Halo reach was supposedly what Bungie has always wanted to do with halo. Which is kind of funny considering how different reach is compared to the original 3 titles. I gave Reach too much shit when it was around. I appreciate it more now for sure. But the MP is still no where near as good as 5's in my opinion. I rank the halo titles as: halo CE>halo 5>halo 3>haloreach=halo 4> halo 2. CE will always be the best. 5 is the best MP we've had in a long time. 4's was too different like reache's. basically halo reach, 4, and 5 were all trying to modernize halo. And regardless of wether or not you like that I feel halo 5 did the best when it comes to that specific goal. 3's MP for me is held back by the random spread on the BR and equipment. I honestly only enjoy the campaign from halo 2. but even then it's campaign doesn't top the charts for me. If halo 2's MP was actually halo 2 anniversary i'd probably like it more. 4 still has the best campaign story wise in my book. Halo 3 has the weakest story telling but probably the best level designs for campaign. And halo reach's story is ranked so low for me because it didn't live up to the book. However setting that aside and actually playing the campaign for what it is it's pretty good. 5's story/campaign isn't terrible. but it's not amazing either.