{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/28/2017 3:22:42 PM
12
The Vex took that gun and made it a beast. Bungie got it back and made it a shame. You're asking them to undo that? Hate to tell you this but: they're not the shiniest coins in the wallet! Just go to Cabela's if you want good weapons.
If you didn't need to do VoG hard mode to drop one, it would be returned with 10 rounds, a 50% increased bloom, lose ammo on spawn, Super disabled, and, Architect on firing! They would say: "it was nerfd because it is Vex"!
English
-
Wtf are you talking about?
-
The topic is the Vex Mythoclast, a gun taken from Guardians by the Vex (race) and heavily modified then returned to the Guardians as the "Vex Mythoclast". On return it was holding about 34 rounds, 3 able to dispatch any Guardian making 18 rounds a team kill, a mag ~2 team kill. Now it takes a mag to damage a Guardian's paint. But, you wouldn't know this because you started playing when real guns were replaced with nerfd toys. The reason you now play with toy guns, Bungie nerfd them. I can name most any gun in the place of the Vex, but none killed that effectively. Do you now know "what the f'k" I'm talking about?
-
Did you have to make it sound so retarded though
-
He has 3 warlocks. It makes sense
-
I would answer you but you clearly are new here and new to Destiny. If you weren't new you would already know why anyone has 3 of the same. You don't, that qualifies you as a noob! Enjoy playing with your toy guns...
-
Yeah I'm so new.
-
Anyone here from day 1 knows you needed three runs at VoG just to get 1 pair of boots. No boots, no 30! Three Warlocks increased that chance three fold. Infusion did not exist. The fact you said I had 3 Warlocks shows you are a new player. I think you call that: a noob!
-
Lol alright dude
-
Do you know what "retarded" means? No, you don't! This is what the term you wrote means: "subaverage intellectual ability equivalent to or less than an IQ of 70 that is accompanied by significant deficits in abilities (as in communication or self-care) necessary for independent daily functioning, is usually present from birth or infancy, and is manifested especially by delayed or abnormal development, by learning difficulties, and by problems in social adjustment" How, exactly, does my answer qualify as that definition? Let's hear your response...
-
Do you know what "retarded" means? No, you don't! This is what the term you wrote means: "subaverage intellectual ability equivalent to or less than an IQ of 70 that is accompanied by significant deficits in abilities (as in communication or self-care) necessary for independent daily functioning, is usually present from birth or infancy, and is manifested especially by delayed or abnormal development, by learning difficulties, and by problems in social adjustment" How, exactly, does my answer qualify as that definition? Let's hear your response...
-
You are trying too hard dude
