{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/25/2017 10:35:49 PM
50
People who quit at the start of a strike.
Every single one of them need to get a temporary activity restriction, 15 minutes+ at the least.
"Oh but maybe they had an emergency!" Any emergency that requires you to leave the game is probably gonna take more than a few minutes, finish it, come back and your restriction should be over.
"Maybe they really hate the strike?"
I really hate many things in trials, does that mean I should be able to leave at the start of a match(therefore ruining the trials experience, much like having to match make four times just to get a team that stays in ruins the strike experience)and not get penalized? Exactly.
There is no real excuse to not punish those who leave strikes, it's them being plain lazy.
English
#Destiny
-
1 ReplyNah I disagree. If im doing strikes with randoms I will check between matches to see if anyone I know has come online. If I dont leave in time for the next strike I will have to bail on your team at the start to go join my friends team and I dont want to be put in time out for that. Fortunately matchmaking will find someone else to fill the spot pretty quickly so its almost no impact or inconvenience to you. Putting someone in timeout after leaving the strike gives no benefit to you as a remaining party in the strike. Also if someone chooses to sit idle in the strike to avoid this timeout it would be more negative impact to you than to have someone else more productive join within a minute of them leaving. I think the mentality or motivator driving this original post was more 'How dare someone leave me! You must avenge me by punishing them!" as opposed to looking for a genuine way to improve the experience.
