So basically its a theory on creation and where everything comes from. The basis of this theory revolves around quantum entanglement(QE). QE basically states that a group or system of particles(though in this exact case its more akin to concepts) if entangled cannot be described as individual particles but rather as a whole system.
So with that out of the way the system in this theory is creation or existence but a system in QE requires at least two parts.
And since we are going back to HOW everything came to be it had to start from nothing. So by this criteria nothing or the concept of nothing would be the first part of the system. So in QE whatever happens to the one part of a system and equal and opposite(sound familiar?) Reaction will occur at the other end of the system.
The natural opposite equivalent of nothing would be, by definition, Everything. But not just everything in our universe, since our universe in inherently incomplete, since if something can be conceived it must exist in some form or another. So by Everything i really mean EVERYTHING, weather it exists in our universe or not.
So now we have a dual system of Everything/Nothing compromising the background or basis for where our universe comes from.
By this definition of everything it would also include every possible variation to our universe that could possibly exist, including universes that are inherently incomplete or imperfect.(sounds like multiverse theory)
But the kicker is that the system is still sorting itself out, because 'everything' is infinite and so to sort it out the Prime Universe(what i call the space where 'everything' exists(PU)) hasn't been able to sort out everything, so what it does is it takes a mixture of concepts/ideas/matter,etc. . . And ejects them into a third part of the system where they then play out that set of conditions they were given and then once its done it returns back to the PU.
As for how it gets back to the PU is by a universe sized black hole. Because of the way gravity works its possible that given enough time all the matter in the universe will go back to the same point, when this happens it will form a gravitational point dense with matter that it will be like a needle, and this needle will cut its way back into the PU.
When this happens the PU and the place that was our universe will be temporarily connected. As for what happens next is like a balloon popping, when the needle pokes the balloon the balloon pops sending out the next set of conditions for the next universe. What we call a "big bang"
This theory explains every condition and other theory i could find on creation(not counting religious ones, purely scientific) and even explains why at certain areas in space the 'fabric' of space time appears to be expanding. Which i point out because if the big bang created our universe it would be easy to find the center because everything would be moving away from the same spot. I believe these areas are 'leaks' in the balloon, areas where past needles formed to start the next universe.
______End of Theory_________
So what do you think, I'm mostly asking so i can get a second opinion on it, make sure theirs no flaws in the logic, etc. . .
Edit:XGN Ghoul
[quote]TL;DR, OP is onto something. QE: see definition below) creates a state of everything and nothing, which merge to create a Big Bang in an endless cycle of big bangs, thus explaining every instance of everything, as well as the creation of the known and theoretical universe.[/quote]
-
Edited by Apollo: 6/20/2016 3:57:22 AMDo you every wonder why were here?
-
To all the people telling him the flaws that helps make it a theory because if it can't be proven wrong one way or another than its more of a philosophy
-
The only correct theory is none of them
-
Excellent theory. However there are issues with it. Quantum entanglement is an occurrence between particles, not necessarily a system of universes known as the multiverse. So, perhaps you are onto something with an opposite and equal reaction, however I would limit you quantum entanglement portion of the theorem to the beginning when the universe merely consisted of elementary particles only, just before the big bang. Perhaps that is what caused the big bang. I would also take into account the law of conservation of energy/matter, they system would not necessarily be able to correct itself because it cannot create spontaneous energy. Space-time fabric would be the only 'energy' able to correct changes. However I think your theory could be quite viable with revisions. It might help to reconcile relativity and quantum mechanics especially with your mention of gravity involving a quantum function. You may also want to take into account motion of time when considering such a theorem.
-
Edited by ClusiveC: 6/20/2016 10:49:15 PMIf there is nothing - which is not anything at all - then where do we get quantum entanglement from? Was QE always there? If that's the case, then there's always been something there...?
-
My theory is that ur mum is large
-
I will say it right away, I am Christian(**gasp** I know) so I believe that an almighty being created everything we see. Thanks why we haven't found life, things in science still mind boggle us and life seems to play out in mysterious ways. I believe that the Earth is to complex to be made by anything other than a supernatural being and that all of this could not be created from nothing. I'm not going to shove anything into anyone's lives. Ppl are aloud to think how they wish and are aloud to have their own opinions. Take that as you like.
-
Edited by f3: 6/20/2016 1:49:24 PMLet me explain the physics for you and everyone else. Once upon a time, long ago, all the planets and moons and suns and shit got together and had a massive -blam!- fest. A big bang, if you will. But the bang was so big that they just exploded into magic space semen. The magic space semens eventually grew up in to planets and stuff again. Keep in mind, they're all related. Eventually, the planets and moons and suns and shit will get really horny again and they will have another space orgy, continuing the cycle. The greatest law of physics reads thusly: [i]incest is wincest.[/i] [spoiler]Newman's Laws of Psychics, bitch. Check 'em.[/spoiler]
-
dangernudle
Gaming - old
God probably used that -
It feels what you're trying to say is the multiverse theory.
-
Guys the universe always existed
-
There are a number of issues that make this "theory," no offense, nonsensical, but to point out the bigger conflicts: Quantum entanglement speaks on observed properties and observed properties alone. The [i]properties[/i] are what being described together, as in, you observe the spin of one particle, so the spin of an entangled particle can be observed to be the opposite. There is no predictability with this, and there is no way by which classical information can be sent through quantum entanglement. So, this implies a couple things, mainly, that the situation you pose is impossible unless there is an outside observer, and that it would mean absolutely nothing to reality. The universe did not start from a black hole, and it will not recede into another Big Bang. There is plenty of mathematics behind this, but to save you the trouble of learning differential geometry, because the energy distribution in the universe is so uniform, it is necessarily infinite, meaning that it will never recede. This is supported by the fact that the universe's expansion is accelerating faster than the speed of light, and has been doing so for quite some time now, and is almost certainly not going to stop, as depicted by the picture above. You don't understand the expansion of space. It expands everywhere at the same time, not from a single point. Expansion is accelerating everywhere at the same time. Also, another universe could not physically interact with our universe. I encourage you to do more research into these topics, because a lot of what you've said tells me that your knowledge is primarily based around sensationalized pop-science, rather than actually learning the mathematics and reasoning behind the conclusions we've made so far.
-
Sounds like ole school dualism. An anti-God locked in battle with a God. But, tell me, does nothingness exist in our universe? Where can we study nothingness? Isn't this an abstract concept? Why is creation and the totality of existence the opposite of nothing? If we have no quantifiable conception of nothingness how can we define it's opposite?
-
yeah about that i dont know why im on here but its not for that you do you
-
I'm sorry to be [b]that guy[/b] but...[spoiler]This is a Hypothesis.[/spoiler]
-
Edited by Alpha: 6/20/2016 3:49:44 AMHypothesis. Sides, the closest thing to Nothing in Physics is probably vaccum. And there's vaccum energy so there's something in the vaccum. So something can popout of nothing. If you want this to be theoretical physics, prove it with mathematical equation.
-
I know you spent a lot of time on this, and we need more people who are doing these kind of brain exercises, but there is no evidence for any of this. It's pseudo science at its best. Also, your description of the PU and what it does, is that of a sentient being- a god. Anyways, it's a cool idea, but it requires more of a leap of faith to believe, than religion requires.
-
There's a TL;DR , thank god
-
God made mostly everything, China made everything else lol jk
-
I read the first sentence and the tl;dr and that sounds retarded
-
Whether and weather are two very different words.
-
My inner science nerd is bothered by your use of theory, which is incorrect. Theories have to be well established ideas with a basis in hard evidence and backed up by multiple experiments. Your idea can barely even qualify as a hypothesis, actually. /end being an anal asshole
-
All i gotta say is, how did all that stuff get there in the first place? [spoiler]i only read like firat 5 sentences[/spoiler]
-
Not true, God created everything ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
-
I got three words into this and my brain exploded
-
I like it.