{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/28/2015 3:28:44 PM
17
Hunters have the blink/quickdraw combo with no other class has & have chain of woe which significantly increases stability for weapons upon landing precision shots which again no other class has, nighstalker can not only go invisible with a grenade but has the shadestep ability which let's you dash in any direction while reducing damage intake(no other class could even fathom this). Hunters do not need any additional things in any of their subclasses
English
-
Actually, that grenade allows all nearby allies to go invisible. -blam!-ing awesome
-
Yeah and hunters can also triple blink by using quickdraw to swap weapons mid-air
-
not anymore
-
The post is dated before 2.0 At the time it was true.
-
That chain of woe explanation is just dumb. You can only activate it by KILLS not landing hits
-
I say precison hits because in most cases headshots equal a kill especially for a person that primarily snipes like i do so the explanation is satisfactory if you actually get kills at least most of the time when you land precision shots
-
You can't compare things hunters have that the other two don't because they all have things the others don't... Worlocks literally get a perk that gives you an extra grenade, and a perk that a melee hit will give you an overshield... Those too are both VERY powerful...
-
Hunters also have backstab which is soo glitched out it triggers when you're in front of a person & because of the fact it wasn't addressed in recent patch notes, when taken king comes out hunters will have double backstab if they use the new exotic arms
-
Don't tell anyone that
-
You are arguing about hunters having abilities that other classes don't, but my point is they were going to give hunters the ability then removed it. The opinion is that this is a wrong doing. Why be bitter towards hunters , why not support them? Is it going to hurt you ? No. Then?
-
I'm making a point that double grenades within a hunter subclass would be an unnecessary advantage when they already have more than enough going for them, I'm not against hunters but i am against a class being strong enough to make other classes irrelevant
-
Yet a warlock having double grenades and double melee is ok? How are other classes not able to compete?
-
The reason the double grenades were removed was simply for the sake of balance, other classes wouldn't be able to compete if hunters had everything the other classes had and more.
-
[quote]Yet a warlock having double grenades and double melee is ok? How are other classes not able to compete?[/quote] You cant use logic on a squirrel man. I agree with your thread too btw.
-
I've quickly discovered that some people on here are so. .. deplorable. And some people will say the most idiotic things or attack you simply for having an opinion. Or just disagree with you just for the sake of disagreeing.
-
Edited by Brother Vance: 8/30/2015 5:32:37 PMWhat's idiotic is not realizing the clear advantages hunters have in this game coupled with asking for even more, the reason i disagree is because i actually like to use more than just my hunter, you know there's like 2 other classes that aren't hunters you might wanna try one
-
I have tried them, so back off with your presumptions comments. Assumptions like that make you look idiotic. And I can advocate what I want to, you're no one to tell me otherwise.
