[quote]Cannot understand the attack on the quote from Phil Spencer except from the mindless fanboys/girls and trolls.[/quote] it's because Microsoft has said this before but nothing has changed because it is a parity situation and they want a game with more content. [quote]This clause never existed in the first place though was part of some of the things they did propose like DRM.[/quote] it's been around for awhile and Phil Spencer has defended it multiple times to make Xbox users feel "premium". [quote]Phil has clarified that it's fine if Indies are timed on other consoles first and If they come to Xbox he is open to paying them more money to add something a little special to game that's been out on other platforms first. I didn't see anywhere that this was mandatory the publishers did this otherwise they wouldn't appear on Xbox.[/quote] Shouldn't everyone be on a even playing field content wise? It's already terrible that game content sometimes gets chopped up and sold to select retailers to make theirs appealing. Why should people get punished for choosing the "wrong" console and get the less content? It's assumed mandatory because indie pubs and devs hint that it is that way. [quote]This is good news for Xbox gamers or those that have multiple platforms that like a particular game. If it's already been out a year be nice to get something extra but if the publisher doesn't want to do that fine.[/quote] It'll be good to see the parity clause or whatever it is at this point completely abolished.

Thanks