Warlock 1.3
Hunter 1.7
(these are last i checked)
I know I'm not the best guardian in crucible, but I know I'm not the worse. Just wanted to get a feeling on what is a "good" vs. "bad" k/d.
I've seen a lot of opinions being ignored or dissmised because of a "bad" k/d and i wanted to get a feel from the community.
-
Edited by Sixclicks: 7/16/2015 5:57:01 PMK/D doesn't necessarily indicate a good player because there are plenty of stat-padders out there that just pitch a tent and camp so they can max their K/D. If you just play the game without thinking about your K/D first and actually play the objective, then your K/D becomes relevent. Honestly anything over a 1.5 is pretty good imo. 1.0 is average (even though the average Destny player has a K/D below 1.0). If I were to just hang back and not play the objective like some players do, I'd easily have over a 2.0 no doubt. In fact, in games where I don't have to rush the objective constantly because I have a good team capable of holding the objectives, I nearly always have over a 2.0. But since I find that incredibly boring and actually like a more aggressive playstyle, I have a 1.73 on my Hunter, 1.65 on my Warlock, and a 1.73 on my Titan. Unless you play mostly Clash. K/D (and kills per game) actually matters a lot more then.