Another thing that should be edited to your ESO vs. Destiny comparison, is the maintenance provided by the various development teams. ESO was a garbled mess of code when it was first released to the PC market. Zenimax worked diligently to fix these problems, thus making ESO probably the most content filled world of it's kind to date. When a lot of people are critical of ESO, they're referring to what the game looked like on the launch date, they choose to ignore the fact that Zenimax has turned a terd into a shiny golden egg for gaming. Destiny, on the other hand, was a terd on day one. And across multiple paywalls the game still remains content-less, filled with bugs and broken mechanics, with only a few words added to the mere sentence of the game's storyline. In this day in age games are bound to have day one woes, it's the nature of the beast. The true test is how a company deals with these problems, listens to their fan base, and ultimately overcomes their challenges. Zenimax/Bethesda loves games, Bungie/Activision loves money, and that's what it really boils down to.